Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Laura PourMeADrink

(42,770 posts)

3. Agree, yet there has to be some point of optimum

Reply to StarfishSaver (Reply #1)

Wed Nov 13, 2019, 08:00 PM

Nov 2019

value? If a person (any person not just today) knew one fact that wouldn't equal one full day automatically, would it? Is there absolutely no consideration given to value vs time there? If questions/diatribes occur that are totally irrelevant to the witnesses exactly what good/value is derived?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

7 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Question about legal/hearing strategy... [View all] Laura PourMeADrink Nov 2019 OP

My take StarfishSaver Nov 2019 #1

Well put. Thanks. trof Nov 2019 #2

Agree, yet there has to be some point of optimum Laura PourMeADrink Nov 2019 #3

From what I've heard, you're in the minority of people who are criticicizing the length, breadth and StarfishSaver Nov 2019 #4

Ha, one who sees things from a different angle! Laura PourMeADrink Nov 2019 #5

It's not a drive thru window. These things are purposeful and take time to get right. NCLefty Nov 2019 #6

So no correlation between value/info derived and Laura PourMeADrink Nov 2019 #7