Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Zalatix

(8,994 posts)
40. Let's play the pampango game of repeating polls that have no substantiation in real life.
Tue Sep 4, 2012, 08:19 PM
Sep 2012

You claim that more Republicans than Democrats oppose offshoring. Yet I guarantee you that everywhere you go, and not just here, you find little support AMONG WORKING CLASS PEOPLE, regardless.

So, essentially, your argument isn't with me, it's with all of working class America, who by and large wish offshoring would go away... along with those who support it. *hint*

Also, Republicans are not the only ones who want to withdraw from the WTO. Leftists despise the WTO, too, especially because of the fact that they've struck down sensible environmental and animal protection laws. You know this. But you are too emotionally invested in the system that rips off American workers to admit it.

As for punitive tariffs... you do realize that we are running a monster non-oil trade deficit, right? If we embargo the nations that have punitive tariffs against us, we put a serious end to the flight of jobs out of the country. Why? Because we kill the trade deficit, IMMEDIATELY. No trade deficit means no jobs leaving the country. You know this. But you are too emotionally invested in the system that rips off American workers to admit it.

"And our trade deficit with 'free trade' countries is practically nonexistent. At what point do you recognize that?" You mean like Mexico and Canada? They're free trade nations. NAFTA, anyone? We're running deficits with both.

http://www.census.gov/foreign-trade/balance/c1220.html
Trade in Goods with Canada:
2012: -17,418.3 (so far)
2011: -34,456.9
2010: -28,542.5

http://www.census.gov/foreign-trade/balance/c2010.html
Trade in Goods with Mexico:
2012: -33,923.4 (so far)
2011: -64,486.9
2010: -66,434.9

"And our trade deficit with 'free trade' countries is practically nonexistent. At what point do you recognize that?" Really, now? Let's look at our balance of trade with Europe, shall we?

http://www.census.gov/foreign-trade/balance/c0003.html
Trade in Goods with European Union:
2012: -51,866.3
2011: -99,881.0
2011: -79,611.5

Now you can brag to your friends that your "our trade deficit with 'free trade' countries is practically nonexistent" argument has been DISPELLED and you've learned something about trade.

Germany, Sweden and many other progressive countries have very strong unions and trade more than the US does. At what point do you recognize that? (And no I have not seen Germany's exploding trade deficit, have you?)
Germany has quite a few protectionist policies. And they're getting their asses kicked by China over solar panels.

How can you be so wrong so often? Your claims about us not running a deficit with 'free trade' nations was particularly embarrassing. I'm sure, of course, that you won't admit being wrong there, even though the US Census Dept. showed you that you were wrong.


And now you understand why low tariffs are killing America, and why your arguments run contrary to the very survival interests of America's working class.

I am sure your misinformed beliefs will not change, but that does not mean that you will stop losing supporters in the Working Class. Your ideals are a proven failure. You tried to prop up Europe and won't even acknowledge that the Euro itself is in danger of collapse because of the austerity plague that they're suffering.

History is dictating, right now, that low tariffs are killing America's working class.

Do not concern yourself about my stubbornness. Do concern yourself with the fact that your ideals have earned the total emnity of ALL of America's working class - Democrats and Republicans alike.


Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

The larger the system a geek named Bob Sep 2012 #1
Not for the .001% and that's all they care about. nt valerief Sep 2012 #2
Yer singin my favorite song... Boxerfan Sep 2012 #3
Yep. limpyhobbler Sep 2012 #4
Thanks for the link. woo me with science Sep 2012 #10
Globalization is good BlueInPhilly Sep 2012 #5
We are evolving into an economy of no jobs and low paying service jobs because of globalism. Zalatix Sep 2012 #11
You quote your Economics 101 textbook like it's Biblical truth. It isn't. reformist2 Sep 2012 #31
"Economics 101" is RW propaganda. Odin2005 Sep 2012 #33
Why don't we just earn what an Ecuadorian does, then? Would that be "evolution"? WinkyDink Sep 2012 #36
service economy = datasuspect Sep 2012 #47
Interestingly enough, Smoot-Hawley was Republican policy. Nye Bevan Sep 2012 #6
High tariffs were republican policy for 100 years from 1880 to 1980. Low tariffs have always been pampango Sep 2012 #7
I now await your direct response to the cited facts I've presented. Again. For the 100th time. Zalatix Sep 2012 #12
I accept the poll you cited regarding "Buy America" policies. Do you accept the poll I cited pampango Sep 2012 #27
Your poll is outdated and inaccurate. Your poll is outdated and inaccurate. Zalatix Sep 2012 #29
Fine we'll play the Zalatix game of accepting the polls we agree with and rejecting those we don't. pampango Sep 2012 #34
Let's play the pampango game of repeating polls that have no substantiation in real life. Zalatix Sep 2012 #40
Nice to see you gave up. Again. Zalatix Sep 2012 #18
You're dealing with brainwashed free trade worshipers who keep copies of the same Elwood P Dowd Sep 2012 #23
Pampango in particular is a habitual drive-by who disappears when his drive-by point is refuted. Zalatix Sep 2012 #25
FDR campaigned against Smoot-Hawley and lowered tariffs when he was in office. No one here pampango Sep 2012 #30
And look what lower tariffs have gotten us. Zalatix Sep 2012 #32
You've been corrected about this dozens of time on DU. girl gone mad Sep 2012 #39
And low tariffs have gotten us in the mess we're in now. Any response to that? Zalatix Sep 2012 #13
Got a link to where a reputable economist makes that assertion? (nt) Nye Bevan Sep 2012 #14
No need for an economist to make any assertion. History is dictating it. Zalatix Sep 2012 #16
Some good stuff in that article. Thanks. Nye Bevan Sep 2012 #20
Those "U.S. computers and telecommunications equipment" were all MADE IN CHINA. Zalatix Sep 2012 #21
"The Number of Export-Supported Jobs Increased By 1.2 Million between 2009 and 2011". Nye Bevan Sep 2012 #22
Okay, and? President Obama is not entirely a Free Trader. Do you know what our trade deficit is? Zalatix Sep 2012 #24
And here's another reputable fact to support my claim. Zalatix Sep 2012 #17
Globalization has been great jeff47 Sep 2012 #8
Workers all over the world have been hurt by corporate globalization. sad sally Sep 2012 #15
Actually, it's better in foreign factories than it was. jeff47 Sep 2012 #19
New and improved! With suicide nets! Zalatix Sep 2012 #26
Environmental destruction. Armed thugs. Child labor. Great. WinkyDink Sep 2012 #37
It only works in the theoretical macro sense and for those who are insulated from its negatives Populist_Prole Sep 2012 #9
They are not into free trade but laissez faire business practices. Cleita Sep 2012 #28
It is working as planned. WinkyDink Sep 2012 #35
That meme is too often an excuse to keep the world beyond our borders poor bhikkhu Sep 2012 #38
You have given no reason why America's working class should listen to you. Zalatix Sep 2012 #41
Oooo, $1 per day! reformist2 Sep 2012 #43
Anyone wanna guess what Bhikku has to say to this? Zalatix Sep 2012 #44
Statistical garbage. girl gone mad Sep 2012 #45
They'll never admit it. Friedman reptile brains are not salvageable. marmar Sep 2012 #42
K&R nt Yuugal Sep 2012 #46
Free traders will never break down. librechik Sep 2012 #48
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Free traders must break d...»Reply #40