Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
19. This is the Wyoming animal cruelty statute
Mon Nov 18, 2019, 10:40 AM
Nov 2019

§ 6-3-203. Cruelty to animals; penalties; limitation on manner of destruction


(a) A person commits cruelty to animals if he knowingly and with intent to cause death, injury or undue suffering:

(i) Overrides an animal or drives an animal when overloaded; or

(ii) Unnecessarily or cruelly beats, tortures, torments, injures, mutilates or attempts to kill an animal; or

(iii) Carries an animal in a manner that poses undue risk of injury or death.

(b) A person commits cruelty to animals if he has the charge and custody of any animal and unnecessarily fails to provide it with the proper food, drink or protection from the weather, or cruelly abandons the animal, or in the case of immediate, obvious, serious illness or injury, fails to provide the animal with appropriate care.

(c) A person commits aggravated cruelty to animals if he:

(i) Repealed by Laws 1987, ch. 91, § 2.

(ii) Owns, possesses, keeps or trains fowls or dogs with the intent to allow the dog or fowl to engage in an exhibition of fighting with another dog or fowl;

(iii) Repealed by Laws 1987, ch. 91, § 2.

(iv) For gain causes or allows any dog or fowl to fight with another dog or fowl;

(v) Knowingly permits any act prohibited under paragraphs (ii) or (iv) of this subsection on any premises under his charge or control;

(vi) Promotes any act prohibited under paragraphs (ii) or (iv) of this subsection; or

(vii) Shoots, poisons or otherwise intentionally acts to seriously injure or destroy any livestock or domesticated animal owned by another person while the animal is on property where the animal is authorized to be present.

(d) A person shall not destroy an animal by the use of a high-altitude decompression chamber or a carbon monoxide gas chamber utilizing a gasoline engine. This subsection is uniformly applicable to all cities and towns.

(e) Unless punishable under subsection (n) of this section, a violation of this section is a misdemeanor punishable by imprisonment for not more than six (6) months, a fine of not more than seven hundred fifty dollars ($750.00), or both except that a subsequent offense is a high misdemeanor punishable by not more than one (1) year imprisonment, a fine of not more than five thousand dollars ($5,000.00), or both.

(f) Nothing in subsection (c) of this section may be construed to prohibit:

(i) The use of dogs in the management of livestock by the owner of the livestock, his employees or agents or other persons in lawful custody of the livestock;

(ii) The use of dogs or raptors in hunting; or

(iii) The training of dogs or raptors or the use of equipment in the training of dogs or raptors for any purpose not prohibited by law;

(iv) Repealed by Laws 2000, ch. 86, § 2.

(v) Repealed by Laws 2000, ch. 86, § 2.

(vi) Repealed by Laws 2000, ch. 86, § 2.

(g) A person commits cruelty to animals if he is knowingly present at any place where an exhibition of fighting of fowls or dogs is occurring for amusement or gain.

(h) If a person convicted of a violation of this section is also the owner of the animal, the court may require the person to forfeit ownership of the animal to the county in which the person is convicted. This subsection shall not affect the interest of any secured party or other person who has not participated in the offense.

(j) In addition to any sentence and penalties imposed under subsections (e), (h) and (n) of this section, the court may:

(i) Require the defendant to pay all reasonable costs incurred in providing necessary food and water, veterinary attention and treatment for any animal affected; and

(ii) Prohibit or limit the defendant's ownership, possession or custody of animals, as the court deems appropriate.

(k) Each animal affected by the defendant's conduct may constitute a separate count for the purposes of prosecution, conviction, sentencing and penalties under this section.

(m) Nothing in subsection (a), (b), (c)(vii) or (n) of this section shall be construed to prohibit:

(i) A person from humanely destroying an animal;

(ii) The use of industry accepted agricultural and livestock practices on livestock;

(iii) Rodeo events, whether the event is performed in a rodeo, jackpot or otherwise; or

(iv) The hunting, capture or destruction of any predatory animal or other wildlife in any manner not otherwise prohibited by law.

(n) A person commits a felony if he commits aggravated cruelty to animals as defined in subsection (c) of this section or knowingly and with intent to cause death, injury or undue suffering, cruelly beats, tortures, torments, injures or mutilates an animal resulting in the death or required euthanasia of the animal. A felony under this subsection or subsection (c) of this section is punishable by not more than two (2) years imprisonment, a fine of not more than five thousand dollars ($5,000.00), or both.

(o) There is created the “cruelty to household pet animals protection account.” Funds shall be credited to the account as provided by law. Funds in the account are continuously appropriated to the attorney general to reimburse county law enforcement agencies for eligible expenses regarding household pet animal cruelty cases under subsection (p) of this section. The attorney general shall develop rules and regulations to establish eligible expenses and to determine how county law enforcement agencies will be reimbursed for the costs of any household pet animal cruelty case, in an amount not to exceed ninety percent (90%) in any particular case. Any reimbursement under this subsection shall be contingent upon available funding and upon a showing that the agency has made reasonable efforts to seek reimbursement from the offender of expenses incurred by the agency, as permitted by law. All funds in the account may be used for and are continuously appropriated for eligible expenses authorized to be made under this subsection. The cruelty to household pet animals protection account shall be a permanent, nonreversion account within the state auditor's office. As used in this subsection and subsection (p) of this section, “household pet” means any privately owned dog, cat, rabbit, guinea pig, hamster, mouse, gerbil, ferret, bird, fish, reptile, amphibian, invertebrate or any other species of domesticated animal sold, transferred or retained for the purpose of being kept as a pet in or near a house. “Household pet” shall not include any livestock as defined in W.S. 23-1-102(a)(xvi).

(p) A person commits household pet animal cruelty if he:

(i) Keeps any household pet in a manner that results in chronic or repeated serious physical harm to the household pet; or

(ii) Keeps the household pet confined in conditions which constitute a public health hazard.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I'm sure there's a loophole in there for the slaughterhouses Blues Heron Nov 2019 #1
There might be, but it's still a great move forward. whathehell Nov 2019 #2
definitely. Blues Heron Nov 2019 #3
You didn't read it? jberryhill Nov 2019 #4
In other words, you can do it, you just can't show it. Lochloosa Nov 2019 #6
The federal government doesn't have general crime jurisdiction jberryhill Nov 2019 #8
Not at all.. whathehell Nov 2019 #30
Accidently came across one of these once, and was absolutely dewsgirl Nov 2019 #7
Sorry, it's not perfect, but it certainly covers more than the crush videos whathehell Nov 2019 #22
"which until now, garnered only misdemeanors" jberryhill Nov 2019 #24
Lots.. Try googling. whathehell Nov 2019 #25
Ha, right jberryhill Nov 2019 #26
Lol.. "Just one"?...North Carolina is one whathehell Nov 2019 #29
You are, unsurprisingly, wrong jberryhill Nov 2019 #38
Lol..I just GAVE you the list of Animal Cruelty Laws in every State whathehell Nov 2019 #42
No you didn't jberryhill Nov 2019 #43
I'll correct that, but given this link DOES give information on the federal law whathehell Nov 2019 #45
I see... jberryhill Nov 2019 #46
Nothing..You're a very stable genius, I'm sure. whathehell Nov 2019 #49
A pdf file with a list of state laws.. whathehell Nov 2019 #52
Wow, I wish I could have gone on without knowing there's such a thing as an animal crush video. cwydro Nov 2019 #48
From what I've seen, this law addresses about 5-10% of the cases of animal mistreatment. WhiskeyGrinder Nov 2019 #5
It covers interstate distribution of crush videos, period jberryhill Nov 2019 #9
I guess it was the LEAST they could do. n/t BlancheSplanchnik Nov 2019 #10
It's sort of the most they can do jberryhill Nov 2019 #13
:( BlancheSplanchnik Nov 2019 #15
Are the animal cruelty laws in your state inadequate? jberryhill Nov 2019 #16
Wyoming's aren't a joke... RichardRay Nov 2019 #18
This is the Wyoming animal cruelty statute jberryhill Nov 2019 #19
At least that's what on the books... RichardRay Nov 2019 #50
Okay. This federal law would not apply to those circumstances, however jberryhill Nov 2019 #51
No, the "leaat" they could do would be nothing.. whathehell Nov 2019 #35
"From what you've seen"? whathehell Nov 2019 #17
People talk about bills before those bills become laws. WhiskeyGrinder Nov 2019 #21
Try broadening your "discussion" whathehell Nov 2019 #23
What is it I'm missing? WhiskeyGrinder Nov 2019 #28
"Animal Crushing" bluecollar2 Nov 2019 #11
the orange sociopath will probably veto it. nt Javaman Nov 2019 #12
...It's not even Thanksgiving yet whathehell Nov 2019 #20
Is this in reference to H.R. 724? sl8 Nov 2019 #14
So now we are all vegan! This is so awesome! Thank you mr president! mucifer Nov 2019 #27
Every Silver Lining has a Cloud, right?.. Riiiight whathehell Nov 2019 #47
I'm so beyond thinking that Republicans are capable of doing anything beneficial for society Snake Plissken Nov 2019 #31
Of course you do, but even in these times of whathehell Nov 2019 #37
But seriously, he deregulated factory farming further than it was before mucifer Nov 2019 #32
Um, no..but if you are, as many here seem to be whathehell Nov 2019 #33
I live in reality: mucifer Nov 2019 #41
Mistaking a state of depression for "reality" can be whathehell Nov 2019 #53
Yet, nary a word regarding Cartaphelius Nov 2019 #34
Excuse me, but please address the Republican Senate, whathehell Nov 2019 #36
Post removed Post removed Nov 2019 #54
Huh? Are you calling me a Right Wing Republican?? whathehell Nov 2019 #55
Great Beringia Nov 2019 #39
Yes, I thought so.. Glad to see someone's more interested whathehell Nov 2019 #44
Republicans/McConnell ALLOWED this DEMOCRATIC BILL to pass. Hortensis Nov 2019 #40
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Senate passes bill making...»Reply #19