General Discussion

panader0

(25,816 posts)

47. I'm glad the Supreme Court accelerated the schedule,

Reply to jberryhill (Original post)

Tue Nov 26, 2019, 01:54 PM

Nov 2019

But I have two questions: Why did they do that, and will trump's lawyers
have enough time?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

59 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

The Supreme Court procedural ruling in one of the Trump tax cases - What you should know [View all] jberryhill Nov 2019 OP

Thanks for this! Nt USALiberal Nov 2019 #1

Could you please stop writing such condescending posts. Many of us know what is going on hlthe2b Nov 2019 #2

I'll do me, thanks jberryhill Nov 2019 #4

Please continue to do so. It helps to understand what various rulings and procedures are.... Lochloosa Nov 2019 #13

I see you edited your post to delete the incendiary language. hlthe2b Nov 2019 #28

I appreciate your post, OP. It helped me with understanding context. Politicub Nov 2019 #35

Thanks for the information....you can't be too basic for some of us, well, me!❤ Karadeniz Nov 2019 #59

TYVM! bluestarone Nov 2019 #5

There is only one condescending post I see here, and it isn't from the OP still_one Nov 2019 #6

Case in point. The OP has edited his post, so I assume he took my point to heart. hlthe2b Nov 2019 #7

It wasn't condescending. It was addressing a certain group MineralMan Nov 2019 #10

I am objecting to the condescending attack on other DUers, not on any attempt to educate. hlthe2b Nov 2019 #15

Yes, of course you are. MineralMan Nov 2019 #16

But of course you did. hlthe2b Nov 2019 #17

Yup. MineralMan Nov 2019 #19

The OP has edited his post, so I assume he took my point to heart. hlthe2b Nov 2019 #26

The OP is expressing a frustration shared by me and others, not just about the kneejerk reaction StarfishSaver Nov 2019 #11

So that is your defense for attacking other DUers? I have seen you try to educate, as I and others hlthe2b Nov 2019 #14

He wasn't attacking DUers StarfishSaver Nov 2019 #20

A post on DU that specifically attacks a prior post by a DUer is attacking a DUer Coventina Nov 2019 #24

Actually it'd be a voilation of community standards and not a violation of TOS Kaleva Nov 2019 #29

Thanks for the clarification. Coventina Nov 2019 #32

True Kaleva Nov 2019 #57

The OP has edited his post, so I assume he took my point to heart. hlthe2b Nov 2019 #25

Or maybe he just figured it wasn't worth the drama StarfishSaver Nov 2019 #27

self-created. hlthe2b Nov 2019 #30

Thank you for this. I completely agree with you. Coventina Nov 2019 #21

Thank you for explaining what is likely to happen next. That last time I looked I didn't.... usaf-vet Nov 2019 #36

+1 demmiblue Nov 2019 #44

Very well put. safeinOhio Nov 2019 #3

I get tired of posts that always assume the worst, no matter what the subject wryter2000 Nov 2019 #43

Thanks for posting this blaze Nov 2019 #8

K&R... spanone Nov 2019 #9

Totally hat tip worthy. Much obliged. MFGsunny Nov 2019 #12

Thanks for your clarification. I hadn't looked into that yet. MineralMan Nov 2019 #18

The immediate negative reaction is understandable StarfishSaver Nov 2019 #22

it's the unwillingness to BECOME educated stopdiggin Nov 2019 #55

How very conservative of them ripcord Nov 2019 #45

Thanks! 2naSalit Nov 2019 #23

Thank you for explaining this. The Velveteen Ocelot Nov 2019 #31

It would also be helpful if DUers didn't call each other "desperately ignorant" Coventina Nov 2019 #33

Maybe so, but immediately knee-jerking without understanding what's going on The Velveteen Ocelot Nov 2019 #34

Ignorance is not possessing knowledge ripcord Nov 2019 #46

So if I called you "desperately ignorant" you would be fine with that. Coventina Nov 2019 #48

But the truth is your students are desperately ignorant on the first day of class ripcord Nov 2019 #58

I appreciate your posts pandr32 Nov 2019 #37

Thanks for your post. I appreciate your efforts. /nt BigBearJohn Nov 2019 #38

Thanks for details. Couple of questions Midnightwalk Nov 2019 #39

Under Rule 21, the Court has broad authority to entertain all sorts of motions onenote Nov 2019 #41

Oh it was a motion Midnightwalk Nov 2019 #50

Don't kick us bro, we are not all attorneys. lark Nov 2019 #40

thanks. your post goes a long ways in demonstrating the prejudice stopdiggin Nov 2019 #56

"The first thing we do, let's kill all the lawyers" mbusby Nov 2019 #42

I'm glad the Supreme Court accelerated the schedule, panader0 Nov 2019 #47

The answer to your first question is - Because the House Democrats asked for it jberryhill Nov 2019 #49

And Trump's lawyers themselves did not object to the House request for an expedited schedule onenote Nov 2019 #52

Procedure confuses people, and ignorance abounds. elleng Nov 2019 #51

I've told you before, and I'll tell you again... Adsos Letter Nov 2019 #53

Recommended. guillaumeb Nov 2019 #54