General Discussion

malaise

(295,145 posts)

8. Thanks

Reply to FBaggins (Reply #7)

Thu Nov 28, 2019, 11:16 AM

Nov 2019

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

45 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

A simple question for every member of the House and Senate [View all] malaise Nov 2019 OP

The answer is no jpak Nov 2019 #1

Presidential Impoundment Act of 1974 says no. lastlib Nov 2019 #2

Wasn't an "Impoundment" issue...Or Chairman Schiff would have hammered that. AncientGeezer Nov 2019 #6

Chairman Schiff definitely hammered that Hermit-The-Prog Nov 2019 #40

Not ONE link to Chr. Schiff....you tried...E for effort. AncientGeezer Nov 2019 #42

obviously you didn't read one linked source Hermit-The-Prog Nov 2019 #43

I always read links AncientGeezer Dec 2019 #44

There is no such thing as a simple question for Republicans PJMcK Nov 2019 #3

Yes... he can FBaggins Nov 2019 #4

Was this a legitimate purpose malaise Nov 2019 #5

I assume not... but it makes the argument circular FBaggins Nov 2019 #7

Thanks malaise Nov 2019 #8

he must notify Congress. he didn't. Hermit-The-Prog Nov 2019 #9

No ..not really. Chairman Schiff would have made that an issue. AncientGeezer Nov 2019 #10

yes, it's really the law ... Hermit-The-Prog Nov 2019 #12

It wasn't a recission....and that's what your citation relies on AncientGeezer Nov 2019 #15

anything over 45 days would be a recission, a changing of the 'contract' Hermit-The-Prog Nov 2019 #16

No....recission has a well defined leagal definition AncientGeezer Nov 2019 #21

I don't know about "leagal" but your beliefs do not trump the law Hermit-The-Prog Nov 2019 #22

You haven't cited applicable Law...there was no recission...and a spelling mistake, really? AncientGeezer Nov 2019 #26

ok, so I'm not a comedian, Hermit-The-Prog Nov 2019 #29

try reading the following, signed by Schiff, Engel, Cummings ... Hermit-The-Prog Nov 2019 #27

Now it's deferrals...vastly different than recission..where are you going to land the goal posts? AncientGeezer Nov 2019 #28

the goalposts have not changed ... Hermit-The-Prog Nov 2019 #30

He didn't move the goalposts. That language is in the provision he cited StarfishSaver Nov 2019 #34

From recission to deferrals.....vastly different definitions ....you know that. AncientGeezer Nov 2019 #35

Not anywhere near the Law....we didn't have a contract with Ukraine AncientGeezer Nov 2019 #24

the contract is between the legislature and the executive Hermit-The-Prog Nov 2019 #31

You're more fun than than the law allows... AncientGeezer Nov 2019 #32

you might want to review Laura Cooper's deposition Hermit-The-Prog Nov 2019 #33

You may want to follow Chairman Schiff's lead.... not your made up path. AncientGeezer Nov 2019 #36

I've cited Schiff, the House, the law, reports, a deposition Hermit-The-Prog Nov 2019 #37

What you cited is a letter....that had no bearing on Shiffs proceedings AncientGeezer Nov 2019 #38

um, the letter was signed by Schiff and laws are not "legally irrelevant" Hermit-The-Prog Nov 2019 #39

You gave it a shot...a crap ton of links AncientGeezer Nov 2019 #41

Not quite FBaggins Nov 2019 #11

no. see above. Hermit-The-Prog Nov 2019 #13

There are 14 above your post....which? AncientGeezer Nov 2019 #17

link... Hermit-The-Prog Nov 2019 #19

Has no legal bearing....there was no recission AncientGeezer Nov 2019 #20

may you be happy in your beliefs Hermit-The-Prog Nov 2019 #23

I'm happy in the facts...dumpster is a scumbag(fact)... but there was no recission, also a fact AncientGeezer Nov 2019 #25

A more important question is: Bluesaph Nov 2019 #14

The Constitution says no - but Emperor Cheetorious the Last says "fuckin' A!" sandensea Nov 2019 #18

This message was self-deleted by its author AncientGeezer Dec 2019 #45