Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

StarfishSaver

(18,486 posts)
19. :-)
Mon Dec 2, 2019, 08:38 PM
Dec 2019

I was too quick with my assumption that this was a typical denial of a stay request. Now, I'm not so sure the appellate court will grant the stay. At least it will be difficult for them to do so without addressing Judge Jackson's analysis, which looks pretty solid.

They are going to appeal that immediately to the CA DC and then to SCOTUS jberryhill Nov 2019 #1
True StarfishSaver Nov 2019 #2
Complete text jberryhill Nov 2019 #3
thanks -- lost that tab before I finished reading Hermit-The-Prog Dec 2019 #13
And if he does appear everything will be executive privilege. blueinredohio Nov 2019 #4
He may try, but they can go back to court to rule on EP. And the courts clearly aren't having it StarfishSaver Nov 2019 #7
Former White House counsel Donald McGahn must comply with House subpoena, Gothmog Nov 2019 #5
I hope to hell they make him say "Executive Privilege". CincyDem Nov 2019 #6
Even if appeatled, this is probably enough cover DeminPennswoods Nov 2019 #8
Neal Katyal-Ruling is a win for Nancy Pelosi and a major loss for trump Gothmog Nov 2019 #9
He must be so tired of winning StarfishSaver Nov 2019 #10
Here is a link to the opinion Gothmog Nov 2019 #11
Judge denied DOJ stay while case is appealed Gothmog Dec 2019 #12
This isn't uncommon. The appellate court will probably grant the stay StarfishSaver Dec 2019 #14
This is interesting Gothmog Dec 2019 #15
It is, indeed StarfishSaver Dec 2019 #17
We both know that as a good lawyer, you were going to read the entire opinion when you got a chance Gothmog Dec 2019 #18
:-) StarfishSaver Dec 2019 #19
Understand that I am corporate lawyer who has tried some securities related cases Gothmog Dec 2019 #20
You were trained to analyze and discern StarfishSaver Dec 2019 #21
Neal Katyal agrees with our analysis Gothmog Dec 2019 #22
Well, if he agrees with us, we know he's right StarfishSaver Dec 2019 #23
Judge flays DOJ, calling its arguments 'disingenuous' & 'unacceptable mischaracterization Gothmog Dec 2019 #16
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»McGahn must appear - can ...»Reply #19