Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

MineralMan

(151,928 posts)
28. Yes. There is a precarious balance that will be needed.
Sat Dec 7, 2019, 02:00 PM
Dec 2019

I'm counting on the Senate to acquit Trump. They seem bent on that. So, it's going to be up to our side to present a case so damning and clear against Trump that he will understand he cannot win the election in November. Then, he will either tough it out or resign. Frankly, by sometime next year, I will be hoping he does not resign, because Pence will certainly pardon him if he does. I would love it if he could be prosecuted criminally by a Democratic DOJ. However, I believe that he will, indeed, resign, if it becomes clear he has no chance of winning reelection. So, a pardon would occur.

The risk is that we, the Democrats, will step on our own tender parts in our zeal, and inadvertently help Trump get a second term. That is the disastrous possibility that makes me fearful. We need to tread both heavily and yet lightly on this process. Heavily, to make it clear how bad Trump has been, but lightly to avoid a backlash that boosts Trump's chances in November.

I do not know how we will do. There are still things that could happen to throw the entire thing out of balance. I do trust Nancy Pelosi to take the measured approach that is needed, but to prosecute this case thoroughly, with the help of others who are more than qualified to do so. Trump is the unknown in the matter. He is perfectly capable of taking some step that puts the nation in danger. That is my greatest fear.

Thanks for your insights!

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Don't look for the word "Treason" in any of the articles. MineralMan Dec 2019 #1
I think a good case for espionauge could be made though SterlingPound Dec 2019 #2
Possibly. However, it would be a stretch and might MineralMan Dec 2019 #6
depends on how strong a case they make against him on it SterlingPound Dec 2019 #8
I suspect you are right. However, it would throw Trump for a loop. kentuck Dec 2019 #3
No. What it would do is create an obvious flaw in the MineralMan Dec 2019 #4
How about Bribery? kentuck Dec 2019 #7
No. Bribery is easily handled. Trump's bargaining MineralMan Dec 2019 #14
Bribery H2O Man Dec 2019 #17
Correct. We (and Trump) misuse that word frequently. TwilightZone Dec 2019 #5
Exactly. We need not to make stupid mistakes in charging Trump. MineralMan Dec 2019 #9
Agreed. TwilightZone Dec 2019 #11
Would obstruction of Congress be valid? kentuck Dec 2019 #12
Yes, of course. I mentioned that above. MineralMan Dec 2019 #15
Treason? getagrip_already Dec 2019 #10
Recommended. H2O Man Dec 2019 #13
I'm sure those are exactly the charges that will be brought. MineralMan Dec 2019 #16
One of the best H2O Man Dec 2019 #18
Well, the defense will be primarily bluster, diversion, and obstruction. MineralMan Dec 2019 #20
When the trial H2O Man Dec 2019 #23
Yes. There is a precarious balance that will be needed. MineralMan Dec 2019 #28
That makes sense. kentuck Dec 2019 #19
In post #17, H2O Man Dec 2019 #21
Sounds about right. kentuck Dec 2019 #22
One of the best things, H2O Man Dec 2019 #24
Can Trump "sit out" his own trial in the Senate and not show up? kentuck Dec 2019 #25
Very interesting questions. H2O Man Dec 2019 #26
This is unchartered territory... kentuck Dec 2019 #27
There are some precedents for trying defendants in absentia. MineralMan Dec 2019 #29
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Which Articles of Impeach...»Reply #28