Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Civil liberties are soooo -- Hell Hath No Fury Sep 2012 #1
New platform also supports death penalty, lower corporate taxes; withdraws 2008 support for unions; woo me with science Sep 2012 #150
I can't imagine anyone willingly giving up power... even myself. Proles Sep 2012 #2
I don't trust Obama with that power--or anyone for that matter DerekG Sep 2012 #36
Amen! 1monster Sep 2012 #64
Obama I can trust but even the best case scenario Nuclear Unicorn Sep 2012 #202
True. Except for the part where the platform reaffirms our COMMITMENT TO CIVIL LIBERTIES. Robb Sep 2012 #3
The poster does this all the time... takes Obama out of context, lies about Democrats, etc. scheming daemons Sep 2012 #4
Vacuous ad hominem. n/t girl gone mad Sep 2012 #20
No, it is the truth emulatorloo Sep 2012 #38
Did the OP take Obama out of context, or lie in the OP? If not, then rhett o rick Sep 2012 #140
Poster has advocated "Letting the Republicans Win in 2012" emulatorloo Sep 2012 #159
Really? I've advocated that? Please, provide a link, or admit you're making shit up. MadHound Sep 2012 #176
Here's your post. emulatorloo Sep 2012 #177
Post removed Post removed Sep 2012 #181
Bullshit - the words are there in black and white emulatorloo Sep 2012 #195
No they are not dreamnightwind Sep 2012 #233
Firedoglake type site? MadHound Sep 2012 #100
Remember when Bushbots eventually had to throw even the National Review under the bus? Marr Sep 2012 #147
Oh this isn't the first time that a well respected publication or writer MadHound Sep 2012 #149
Mother Jones? Puregonzo1188 Sep 2012 #101
Apparently you can't, MadHound Sep 2012 #8
Why is there nothing on fatherhood? Robb Sep 2012 #133
Because you are cherry picking what you're posting, MadHound Sep 2012 #135
That's a lie, MadHound. Robb Sep 2012 #136
No, it isn't, MadHound Sep 2012 #138
"Boilerplate"? What are you talking about? Robb Sep 2012 #145
Yes, have you? MadHound Sep 2012 #146
Stop Lying. We are on to you. You advocated letting the Republicans win in 2012 emulatorloo Sep 2012 #161
Again with that shit, put up or shut up. MadHound Sep 2012 #178
I provided a link - your own words emulatorloo Sep 2012 #194
So again, we see you are a liar, MadHound Sep 2012 #189
What you wrote is there in black and white. You said it would be "better" if the Republicans win. emulatorloo Sep 2012 #193
No, this is what I said MadHound Sep 2012 #196
Can the BS. In your construct, "Dying Quickly" = Republicans winning. emulatorloo Sep 2012 #203
Sez you... derby378 Sep 2012 #235
Be careful the Obama-bashers will call you a dingbat. Odin2005 Sep 2012 #117
I guess it was too tempting Summer Hathaway Sep 2012 #5
Not only that... he lies as much as Paul Ryan does.... the Platform REAFFIRMS the commitment to scheming daemons Sep 2012 #6
Acutally, read the article, MadHound Sep 2012 #10
The '08 platform did not condemn the Patriot Act SOS Sep 2012 #94
Let's see here, MadHound Sep 2012 #102
"review" and "revisit" mean nothing SOS Sep 2012 #251
I learned to take anything the OP says Summer Hathaway Sep 2012 #13
I've learned that you're long on insults, MadHound Sep 2012 #104
I have rarely interacted with you Summer Hathaway Sep 2012 #116
Thank you for demonstrating my point so succinctly, MadHound Sep 2012 #129
Applause! Howler Sep 2012 #171
Sorry, will not forget that you advocate for letting the Republican win in 2012 emulatorloo Sep 2012 #175
Post removed Post removed Sep 2012 #185
Wow... SidDithers Sep 2012 #186
Yes, amazing isn't it that people will stoop to lying on this site, MadHound Sep 2012 #190
They're your words and they're pretty clear... SidDithers Sep 2012 #199
Excellent post. And just a reminder, during the Bush administration the shredding of the sabrina 1 Sep 2012 #224
Of course I have not Summer Hathaway Sep 2012 #234
Well said. n/t FSogol Sep 2012 #143
Do you have any rebuttal to the subject of the OP? MadHound Sep 2012 #9
No response to that one, eh? +1,000 for the killshot argument! Zalatix Sep 2012 #42
Of course not. woo me with science Sep 2012 #80
Vacuous ad hominem. n/t girl gone mad Sep 2012 #23
Vacuous reply Summer Hathaway Sep 2012 #89
Nailed it... SidDithers Sep 2012 #28
Thank you. This shit is getting old. emulatorloo Sep 2012 #39
The bullies are active, trying to silence dissent. How not-Democratic. rhett o rick Sep 2012 #46
Knew it wouldn't be too long Summer Hathaway Sep 2012 #56
Are you trying to eliminate dissent by name-calling? nm rhett o rick Sep 2012 #60
No. Summer Hathaway Sep 2012 #69
ROFL! woo me with science Sep 2012 #82
If you believe that people here Summer Hathaway Sep 2012 #86
The OP stated an opinion about the platform. Did you debate his opinion? Or did you rhett o rick Sep 2012 #109
If you honestly believe Summer Hathaway Sep 2012 #121
Your response to the OP was, "I guess it was too tempting for you not to post some rhett o rick Sep 2012 #131
Yes, that was my response to the OP Summer Hathaway Sep 2012 #242
The issue he brought up is important as you agreed. But you didn’t address the issue. rhett o rick Sep 2012 #246
Like calling good DUers who disagree with you "bullies"? Robb Sep 2012 #70
Please define a "good Duer" versus a "bad Duer". blue neen Sep 2012 #74
How about "everyone who doesn't call people who disagree bullies"? Robb Sep 2012 #75
Psst, Robb! woo me with science Sep 2012 #84
Oh, good. The Green Swarm. Robb Sep 2012 #88
So-- when "Mother Jones" was carrying water for the pro-censorship Christian Right and boosting Warren DeMontague Sep 2012 #213
Oh my WORD. woo me with science Sep 2012 #215
I'm saying they lost a lot of credibility on complaining about Obama not distancing himself enough Warren DeMontague Sep 2012 #216
That response is dismissive of reality. woo me with science Sep 2012 #220
I agree that the crackdown on med. marijuana is reprehensible, and needs to end. Warren DeMontague Sep 2012 #221
No, not "too complicated", but definitely too condescending... blue neen Sep 2012 #96
I would characterize as bullies those who resort to personal attacks rather than address the Luminous Animal Sep 2012 #83
Thank you. nt woo me with science Sep 2012 #90
As I said below, that position relies on such an obtuse reading of the platform Robb Sep 2012 #92
Actually, the article specifically spells out what is missing from this platform that Luminous Animal Sep 2012 #98
Granny Smiths -- gone! Robb Sep 2012 #99
You are off message. You are supposed to use the OTFLMAO smilie. Please report back to Luminous Animal Sep 2012 #103
I'll settle for you getting a new shtick. Robb Sep 2012 #105
I'm Still Waiting RobinA Sep 2012 #209
The OP made a point. It was clearly not anti-Obama. Instead of debating the point rhett o rick Sep 2012 #113
The OP continued his disinformation campaign emulatorloo Sep 2012 #180
Lying some more. n/t MadHound Sep 2012 #184
You forgot to show what was "disinformation". You are clearly only interested in smearing him rhett o rick Sep 2012 #232
Well said. woo me with science Sep 2012 #78
Very well said. nt woo me with science Sep 2012 #93
I do so enjoy the carefully constructed cross many people carry with them LanternWaste Sep 2012 #142
+100 nt Skip Intro Sep 2012 #158
What the fuck is fundamentally wrong with people woo me with science Sep 2012 #77
What the fuck is fundamentally wrong Summer Hathaway Sep 2012 #85
I think that you let your blind allegiance get in the way of your rhett o rick Sep 2012 #114
Same old/same old Summer Hathaway Sep 2012 #119
someone should tell Skinner to come on back. Whisp Sep 2012 #7
Do you have any substantial rebutall against the charges laid forth in the article? MadHound Sep 2012 #12
Do you ever post anything that doesn't have the intent of helping the GOP? scheming daemons Sep 2012 #14
Ah, so advocating the concept of hanging onto our civil liberties helps the 'Pugs, MadHound Sep 2012 #24
Life is too short Summer Hathaway Sep 2012 #19
So in other words, you don't have a rebutal, MadHound Sep 2012 #27
Well, I'm up to post 27 and no serious rebuttal yet. Lots of ad hominem though. Vattel Sep 2012 #71
That made me LOL! Summer Hathaway Sep 2012 #15
Aw man? Give it a rest. trof Sep 2012 #11
Aw man, ignore the disappearance of our civil liberties, MadHound Sep 2012 #16
Remember Senator Leahy? OnyxCollie Sep 2012 #123
He can't. His goal is to depress Democratic enthusiasm. scheming daemons Sep 2012 #17
and apparently he believes that by trashing the Democrats so the republicans win, it will help. progressivebydesign Sep 2012 #21
GREAT analogy. klook Sep 2012 #228
And it really gets his back up Summer Hathaway Sep 2012 #22
Vacuous ad hominem. n/t girl gone mad Sep 2012 #25
No, it is the truth. emulatorloo Sep 2012 #41
Nailed it... SidDithers Sep 2012 #31
Do you know why the platform changed? sabrina 1 Sep 2012 #43
They dont care if the platform changes. They dont care what it says. They rhett o rick Sep 2012 #50
Well, they are very much in the minority if that is the case. A vast majority of Americans sabrina 1 Sep 2012 #53
I must disagree. When Bush was president and proceeded to eliminate rhett o rick Sep 2012 #59
Actually, the reason why those issues were included in the 2008 Democratic platform was because Luminous Animal Sep 2012 #87
Kind of a bait and switch. nm rhett o rick Sep 2012 #108
The Left was very vocal about their opposition to Bush's shredding of the Constitution. sabrina 1 Sep 2012 #223
I agree that the left was very vocial, but most Americans could care less. rhett o rick Sep 2012 #231
This thread sure supports that picture. Vattel Sep 2012 #73
Well, considering that the current administration MadHound Sep 2012 #148
+1 Bobbie Jo Sep 2012 #58
Some of these planks in the platform are kind of depressing people's enthusiams. limpyhobbler Sep 2012 #65
I'm sorry that you didn't get your pony. progressivebydesign Sep 2012 #18
Vacuous ad hominem. n/t girl gone mad Sep 2012 #26
I'm starting to wonder if all the "Vacuous ad hominem" are from sock puppets fascisthunter Sep 2012 #29
Civil Liberties are ponies. You need to remember that! sabrina 1 Sep 2012 #44
Amendments, schmamendments. woo me with science Sep 2012 #211
. blue neen Sep 2012 #72
Ominous Vacuum Ad jberryhill Sep 2012 #81
I haven't seen it often but I think girl gone mad has the right idea. I am going to follow her lead Luminous Animal Sep 2012 #91
You Don't Get RobinA Sep 2012 #212
but apparently you DID get your pony, so fuck everyone else? frylock Sep 2012 #226
That's gonna leave a mark derby378 Sep 2012 #236
I't the "Run to the Right" by our Party...STRONG on WAR/MILITARY... KoKo Sep 2012 #30
I miss Unrec... SidDithers Sep 2012 #32
Me too. liberalmuse Sep 2012 #35
Agreed. Jamaal510 Sep 2012 #55
Yeah, about that. JoeyT Sep 2012 #112
Civil Liberties should be unrec'd! sabrina 1 Sep 2012 #45
Yeah, why does he hate Amurika!!11! Bobbie Jo Sep 2012 #222
Of course, I think a vast majority of DUers do. sabrina 1 Sep 2012 #225
Of course... Bobbie Jo Sep 2012 #229
I didn't miss a thing! sabrina 1 Sep 2012 #239
You would like it much better if you personally could TS anyone rhett o rick Sep 2012 #51
It's agreat American tradition pscot Sep 2012 #61
You forget this is a partisan website... SidDithers Sep 2012 #63
But Sid, the OP didnt "trash Obama". He simply wanted to discuss the platform. rhett o rick Sep 2012 #107
And being that it is a Partisan board and we are all Democrats, well most of us that is, sabrina 1 Sep 2012 #218
... SidDithers Sep 2012 #227
... sabrina 1 Sep 2012 #240
. graywarrior Sep 2012 #95
We really don't need this right now. liberalmuse Sep 2012 #33
As they pretty much have under this administration. Both parties are united in their contempt.... villager Sep 2012 #34
I know we're supposed to be all Kumbaya and stuff but I'll give this a rec. progressoid Sep 2012 #37
+1 leftstreet Sep 2012 #40
Thank you. It is a critical issue, woo me with science Sep 2012 #120
Yep Kurovski Sep 2012 #243
This message was self-deleted by its author Kurovski Sep 2012 #244
They're just removing the false advertising in the '08 commercial..er..platform. Tierra_y_Libertad Sep 2012 #47
O RLY? sakabatou Sep 2012 #48
Being that I am a Progressive Democrat advocating for Civil Liberties always gets a rec sabrina 1 Sep 2012 #49
I voted to abolish Shrub not fortify him, it's an implement of Totalitarianism.... orpupilofnature57 Sep 2012 #52
I am currently and will continue to work for the reelection of Pres Barack Obama rhett o rick Sep 2012 #54
K&R, nt. druidity33 Sep 2012 #57
Some people prefer to die OnyxCollie Sep 2012 #62
That's Kurovski Sep 2012 #245
Truly sad. limpyhobbler Sep 2012 #66
This is a lie. Read the platform. Politicub Sep 2012 #67
Why has it changed since 2008? Tell the truth now. nm rhett o rick Sep 2012 #111
Paul Ryan is hiring nt ecstatic Sep 2012 #68
I hear he is only interested in people who never question, who just march in lockstep sabrina 1 Sep 2012 #238
Wow, what a pathetic response to your post. Vattel Sep 2012 #76
What a deliberately obtuse reading of the platform. Robb Sep 2012 #79
You don't think the differences are significant? Vattel Sep 2012 #106
Excellent post. Thank you. woo me with science Sep 2012 #208
Your Argument RobinA Sep 2012 #214
K&R This is an important post. woo me with science Sep 2012 #97
This is an important issue. But look at all the bullies that want to rhett o rick Sep 2012 #110
"Name calling is all they got. DINO's the lot"... SidDithers Sep 2012 #115
I know, I know Summer Hathaway Sep 2012 #122
I notice that you dont want to discuss the OP. I wonder why? nm rhett o rick Sep 2012 #139
It's a tactic. Pollute the thread with garbage and misdirection, woo me with science Sep 2012 #137
This nonsense does not justify a rebuttal. Odin2005 Sep 2012 #118
+ AtomicKitten Sep 2012 #125
Nice to see that you're so willing to toss somebody's civil liberties out of window, MadHound Sep 2012 #141
Whichever party takes control will need all those powers. They will be needed. It's that bad. dogknob Sep 2012 #124
Wow! n/t sabrina 1 Sep 2012 #241
I absolutely loved the speeches tonight but i did turn to my husband FedUpWithIt All Sep 2012 #126
Excellent Mother Jones article, MH Le Taz Hot Sep 2012 #127
We all know the drill. woo me with science Sep 2012 #134
Propagandists? You are projecting. All your OP's are conspiracy theories that excuse Republicans emulatorloo Sep 2012 #157
Care to address the specific omission of that civil rights language? woo me with science Sep 2012 #167
Cool story, bro. nt msanthrope Sep 2012 #128
I'm glad to see people feel passionately about this at least. raouldukelives Sep 2012 #130
Kick. This is far more important woo me with science Sep 2012 #132
More important information about the platform woo me with science Sep 2012 #144
What's desperate is your attempt persuade DU'ers of how evil Democrats are emulatorloo Sep 2012 #154
Care to address the actual changes to the platform? nt woo me with science Sep 2012 #163
Uh huh emulatorloo Sep 2012 #166
That doesn't answer the question at all. woo me with science Sep 2012 #170
Post removed Post removed Sep 2012 #173
Saying that it is a lie is a blatant lie. woo me with science Sep 2012 #179
Post removed Post removed Sep 2012 #187
Why advocate lower corporate tax rates in the platform? woo me with science Sep 2012 #205
desperation bobduca Sep 2012 #183
Sorry, Woo is a liar. Plenty of examples in this thread. emulatorloo Sep 2012 #191
Post removed Post removed Sep 2012 #192
Stop spinning. You wrote what you wrote. It would be "better" if Republican won emulatorloo Sep 2012 #198
No, this is what I said MadHound Sep 2012 #200
Your construct is: "dying quickly" = Republicans emulatorloo Sep 2012 #206
I guess thats why you have accepted the role of 'Archivist' bobduca Sep 2012 #204
I'm really tired of reading such simplistic bald-faced lies from you fascisthunter Sep 2012 #247
kick woo me with science Sep 2012 #151
No reports of extraordinary rendition to torture or other cruelty under [Obama's] administration. ProSense Sep 2012 #152
Woo has a "fantasy Obama" act too. Appearing daily on DU with his empty chair. emulatorloo Sep 2012 #155
Typical smear with no content. woo me with science Sep 2012 #162
You want content re your trollish conspiracy theories? Check your OP's. emulatorloo Sep 2012 #169
Kill lists, indefinite detention, and why is Obama silent woo me with science Sep 2012 #160
Blah! n/t ProSense Sep 2012 #165
And the actual platforms from 2004, 2008, 2012? Well, let's just ignore that shall we? GoneOffShore Sep 2012 #153
Facts don't matter to the Anti-Democrat Trolls emulatorloo Sep 2012 #156
Care to address the actual changes to the platform? woo me with science Sep 2012 #164
Here ProSense Sep 2012 #168
Care to address the language that was removed? woo me with science Sep 2012 #174
No, but maybe ProSense Sep 2012 #188
More deliberate obfuscation. Of course you refuse to address the changes woo me with science Sep 2012 #197
WTF is that? ProSense Sep 2012 #201
I am tired of arguing with liars. emulatorloo Sep 2012 #172
Exactly... SidDithers Sep 2012 #182
Typical insult, no ability to refute. nt woo me with science Sep 2012 #207
... SidDithers Sep 2012 #217
... sabrina 1 Sep 2012 #219
the 2012 platform even brags about the supposed disruption of Al Qaeda.... Green_Lantern Sep 2012 #210
Very clear and lucid OP MadHound! Howler Sep 2012 #230
SO DON'T FUCKING VOTE FOR HIM!!!!!!! RiffRandell Sep 2012 #237
a tough pill to swallow for sure fascisthunter Sep 2012 #248
Remember this guy? warrprayer Sep 2012 #249
I miss him. woo me with science Sep 2012 #250
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Civil liberties disappear...»Reply #226