General Discussion

Dragonfli

(10,622 posts)

48. I think her "work" is pathetically easy, not worth minimium wage and yet she earns in one year

Wed Sep 5, 2012, 09:37 PM

Sep 2012

What an actual hard working woman makes in ten (or more likely twenty five).

Tough work there,. I can see all the callouses, I wish you would respect blue collar woman that do REAL WORK one-tenth as much,
But you likely have never worked on anything requiring sweat yourself so I doubt you can identify with real working woman.

Your soul is much poorer for not knowing the difference and not knowing the women you should be supporting over her, rather than supporting that entitled idiot over real women.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

78 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Small rant: It is Andrea MITCHELL, DUers. [View all] elleng Sep 2012 OP

Well, we know that KamaAina Sep 2012 #1

it is important, that is not a well known fact Whisp Sep 2012 #4

I'm offended that some think pointing out any such thing is important. elleng Sep 2012 #11

Well, you may be onto something there KamaAina Sep 2012 #16

Right. Thanks, KamaAina. elleng Sep 2012 #21

Her husband is NOT just ANY Republican, FGS. WinkyDink Sep 2012 #37

SO WHAT? elleng Sep 2012 #43

A journalist who covers government is not equivalent to a lawyer. Jim Lane Sep 2012 #58

Fuck Andrea Mitchell. Jazzgirl Sep 2012 #2

+1 GodlessBiker Sep 2012 #3

You first...nt PCIntern Sep 2012 #13

eeewwwww Cali_Democrat Sep 2012 #19

He probably needs Viagra anyway AnnieBW Sep 2012 #45

and fuck you Andrea Greenspan too DontTreadOnMe Sep 2012 #20

Not with Ann Coulter's zbdent Sep 2012 #25

Please delete this comment. Ms. Toad Sep 2012 #69

Please delete this comment Vanje Sep 2012 #78

I think people just want to tag her with the failed policies of her husband that madinmaryland Sep 2012 #5

We know she 'still supports' policies elleng Sep 2012 #7

That isn't it at all. Her reports are transparently biased and Cleita Sep 2012 #8

I'm with you, elleng. She's not all bad, by any means, and shouldn't be discounted gateley Sep 2012 #6

And that's exactly why we don't like her. Cleita Sep 2012 #9

That's perfectly valid, but she goes by Mitchell and calling her Greenspan seems childish. gateley Sep 2012 #31

Her views themselves are "Greenspanian" should we pretend her views are otherwise? Dragonfli Sep 2012 #40

Right. I'd have you pretend she doesn't have those views. gateley Sep 2012 #49

Then you understand that the "Greenspan" honorific is descriptive Dragonfli Sep 2012 #50

I don't recall saying I respected her, liked her, or agree with her. gateley Sep 2012 #52

Thanks, gate. elleng Sep 2012 #47

You are missing the whole point!!! It isn't that people give a shit about her last name.... Logical Sep 2012 #10

Highly offensive suggestion. elleng Sep 2012 #12

Wow, yes shocking thinking someones spouse influences their opinion. I guess you think..... Logical Sep 2012 #15

I think we are supposed to pretend Clarence's wife isn't married to him, just like with Andrea. Dragonfli Sep 2012 #41

if i were married to mr greenspan, i'd change both of my names spanone Sep 2012 #14

easier not to be married to that jerk in the first place. niyad Sep 2012 #17

Thank you for your concern. She still sucks. nt valerief Sep 2012 #18

She is an asshat and her connection to Greenspan ought to be disqualifying Warren Stupidity Sep 2012 #22

Is Tweety still ok though? tjdee Sep 2012 #23

Working? R. Daneel Olivaw Sep 2012 #24

Not a chance. elleng Sep 2012 #28

You should have completed your sentence R. Daneel Olivaw Sep 2012 #33

Much harder than blue collar folk I am sure Dragonfli Sep 2012 #42

No, this is Democratic Underground elleng Sep 2012 #46

I think her "work" is pathetically easy, not worth minimium wage and yet she earns in one year Dragonfli Sep 2012 #48

all of a sudden? HiPointDem Sep 2012 #67

I'll call her whatever the hell I want. Zoeisright Sep 2012 #26

Of course you will, elleng Sep 2012 #27

I dare say not one person who posts on DU and refers to her as Mrs. Greenspan is even . . . . . Stinky The Clown Sep 2012 #29

small rant--the title should read "It's Andrea MITCHELL" not "Its Andrea MITCHELL" niyad Sep 2012 #30

Indeed. 'It is Andrea MITCHELL.' elleng Sep 2012 #35

Fuck that piece of shit media whore. tabasco Sep 2012 #32

Insulting Ms. Greenspan is the whole point of the nickname. TeamPooka Sep 2012 #34

does that mean I can't refer to Wolf Blitzer as "Leslie" anymore either? Coexist Sep 2012 #36

Yeah, well, TS, Eliot. I'll knock her and the man she rode in with. WinkyDink Sep 2012 #38

media traitor upi402 Sep 2012 #39

R E S P E C T it should be a two-way street rustydog Sep 2012 #44

Thanks, rustydog. elleng Sep 2012 #64

She is a paid propagandist. Ikonoklast Sep 2012 #51

As one of the main offenders, I understand your rant. rufus dog Sep 2012 #53

Thanks for the offer, rufus. elleng Sep 2012 #54

thank you for your post. rufus dog Sep 2012 #55

Sure. elleng Sep 2012 #56

Good one! rufus dog Sep 2012 #57

TROUBLE, rufus! elleng Sep 2012 #61

The Dog is trying rufus dog Sep 2012 #76

Really good, and I appreciate it/you. elleng Sep 2012 #77

Regardless of her feelings about an issue mykpart Sep 2012 #59

Right, in fact, one's point of view should NOT show in reporting, elleng Sep 2012 #62

A. Greenspan pewpface Sep 2012 #60

Are you, pewpface, calling the 40 or so DUers who have responded here bigots? elleng Sep 2012 #63

You miss the point Duppers Sep 2012 #65

"journalist" my ass. she's a paid propagandist. i give her no respect. HiPointDem Sep 2012 #66

i think it's funny how charges of 'sexism' 'racism' etc. so quickly follow slams on the 1%ers who HiPointDem Sep 2012 #68

"ANDREA GREENSPAN" is a DERISIVE TERM, just like "MARY CARVILLE" would be swayne Sep 2012 #70

Ah the Democratic Party.. land of thin skins and endless umbrage. progressivebydesign Sep 2012 #71

With all of the things going on HappyMe Sep 2012 #72

Nor did I. elleng Sep 2012 #74

Selective outrage Vinnie From Indy Sep 2012 #73

Don't understand 'pomposity' I guess, Indy. elleng Sep 2012 #75