Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Perfect conversation starters for family fun [View all]braddy
(3,585 posts)37. No, 1946 to 1964 is the absolutely most accepted definition of boomers, even the govt. uses that.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
46 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
No, 1946 to 1964 is the absolutely most accepted definition of boomers, even the govt. uses that.
braddy
Dec 2019
#37
I'm a boomer and don't see anything special about being born in 1946 or 1964 that puts those people
braddy
Dec 2019
#42
Heh, thanks - but I remember Nixon on the B&W back when I was learning to write the alphabet :)
Pluvious
Dec 2019
#20
And just TRY mentioning that the coup on Bolivia's Morales shows our foreign policy is still wrong
sandensea
Dec 2019
#13