Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Perfect conversation starters for family fun [View all]wnylib
(26,208 posts)43. Cookie cutter categories are never fully
accurate, except with cookies. Even then there are always the ones, like my recent Xmss cookies, that vsry from the pattern.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
46 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
No, 1946 to 1964 is the absolutely most accepted definition of boomers, even the govt. uses that.
braddy
Dec 2019
#37
I'm a boomer and don't see anything special about being born in 1946 or 1964 that puts those people
braddy
Dec 2019
#42
Heh, thanks - but I remember Nixon on the B&W back when I was learning to write the alphabet :)
Pluvious
Dec 2019
#20
And just TRY mentioning that the coup on Bolivia's Morales shows our foreign policy is still wrong
sandensea
Dec 2019
#13