General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: This time the right guy had a gun, and stopped more carnage. [View all]VOX
(22,976 posts)Take any mass shooting, from the University of Texas in 1966 to Las Vegas in 2017 to Christchurch NZ this year. I defy anyone to match those appalling body counts with a knife or hammer.
Guns are impersonal killing someone with a firearm takes little effort, but killing with a knife or blunt instrument involves getting in close to ones victim, feeling their breath, hearing their screams, getting soaked with their blood, and possibly struggling to finish the job.
Im fine with people owning a handgun or shotgun for home defense. But should EVERY American carry on their person a tool that grants them the power to deal swift death in large numbers? Common sense informs the answer: a resounding NO.
Its way past time for some sensible gun safety laws. Of course no law will stop mass shootings, but if improved background checks (which should be mandatory if one wishes to own a tool designed specifically to take lives), and closing the loopholes in gun-show sales, maybe, just maybe, some lives would be spared. Its worth a try, at the very least.