Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: "Oh, so you think Solemani was a good guy?" [View all]braddy
(3,585 posts)9. "them" shouldn't have been in Iraq attacking us, Soleimani should have stayed in Iran.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
119 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
No, it was not, but then we didn't make that decision. What happens when ...
marble falls
Jan 2020
#44
Yes, but will the blowback be worth it? Also, we had numerous opportunities before...
Dennis Donovan
Jan 2020
#4
We killed him as he arrived in Iraq to personally lead the attacks on our embassy that is burning
braddy
Jan 2020
#6
I did during Vietnam and again when we took on the Soviets in the mid 1980s, but the three times I
braddy
Jan 2020
#12
Our people in combat arms are not having a sad over killing this monster who was murdering
braddy
Jan 2020
#18
My service is irrelevant - I oppose this action - clearly it's ridiculously planned n/t
Dennis Donovan
Jan 2020
#72
Oh, so we don't attempt to neutralize an element responsible for the deaths of American personnel...
Marengo
Jan 2020
#66
Inside the military there are differences, those who serve in combat arms units and elite units are
braddy
Jan 2020
#96
I don't know that Suleimani was a monster but the people of his nation thought ...
marble falls
Jan 2020
#78
"them" shouldn't have been in Iraq attacking us, Soleimani should have stayed in Iran.
braddy
Jan 2020
#9
...and "we" should've continued to pull embassy personnel out last week.
Dennis Donovan
Jan 2020
#13
We don't need to surrender our embassies to Iran, instead we fought back, in Iraq, not Iran.
braddy
Jan 2020
#16
That fails to answer the question - pulling civilians out is not a capitulation...
Dennis Donovan
Jan 2020
#21
Obviously they didn't see the need to, nor to demonstrate fear unnecessarily, I'm not interested in
braddy
Jan 2020
#25
This could have been achieved covertly, giving the US plausible deniability
Dennis Donovan
Jan 2020
#27
It could have been not done at all. Kim is more dangerous than that guy was ...
marble falls
Jan 2020
#52
No sarcasm needed - you hit the nail on the head. This isn't about taking a bad guy out...
Dennis Donovan
Jan 2020
#54
That was by design - most knew that the RW's first talking point on this would be the old canard...
Dennis Donovan
Jan 2020
#17
They have ceded the high ground to the GOP as soon as they opened their mouth
Miguelito Loveless
Jan 2020
#20
Correct - he was a GD OFFICIAL of the Iranian government, and a HIGH one at that
Cosmocat
Jan 2020
#37
Doesn't matter if he was a bad guy. There are a lot of bad guys out there. You don't
SweetieD
Jan 2020
#57
In an alternate universe, Saddam takes out Solemani or Solemani takes out Saddam...
Tommy_Carcetti
Jan 2020
#62
If citizens shouldn't question how their government takes or spends lives, ask yourself if ...
mahatmakanejeeves
Jan 2020
#92