Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

KY_EnviroGuy

(14,788 posts)
53. From my meager perch, it's equally possible that you or the pope coordinated it.
Fri Jan 3, 2020, 01:05 PM
Jan 2020

I also don't know for a fact that anyone coordinated it.

Do you really think an everyday person posting on an internet blog has the faintest legal proof of anything this man or any of the hundreds of militant groups have done? About all I'm certain of is that he was known to frequent a number of locations in Syria and Iraq where he had operatives believed to have Iranian connections, and he's been doing that for years. There's photographic proof of those visits, but neither you or I or anyone else on this blog have the resources to prove exactly what he said or did there or anywhere.

I seriously question why we waste our time speculating on such "possibles" happening half-way around the globe in an extremely complex zone where tribal, secular and militant group loyalties rule, deception is a way of life, and solid intel is iffy at best.

Do we even really know exactly what persons attacked the base via photos or videos of actual people? Every time there's an evil, murderous event of terrorism in the world, numerous groups proudly lay claim for responsibility.

My point is the internet and media sources are awash with information that has no firm foundation that would be admissible in a court of law. Donald Trump is one of those sources on a frequent basis. A huge number of people around the globe are in the business of spreading lies, innuendos, rumors and conspiracy theories and outright bullshit, and they exist on both sides of any fence. Our last presidential election is solid proof. I refuse to add to that problem.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Depends on which general and which airport. The Velveteen Ocelot Jan 2020 #1
An old Revolutionary War tactic revived by Trump Blue Owl Jan 2020 #2
There were airports during the US revolution? Renew Deal Jan 2020 #4
Why yes, according to Donny Blue Owl Jan 2020 #6
LOL Renew Deal Jan 2020 #8
When it's the #2 guy in the country, you better believe they're thinking it is. onecaliberal Jan 2020 #3
This is an act of war. Period. BigmanPigman Jan 2020 #5
+1000 UniteFightBack Jan 2020 #11
Can we flip that around? ripcord Jan 2020 #47
No, and that's an act of proxy war. Bucky Jan 2020 #55
When he is an Iranian terrorist on the terrorist list for killing 100s of Americans braddy Jan 2020 #7
Does "he deserved it" matter? Renew Deal Jan 2020 #12
You posted to the wrong person, that isn't my quote. braddy Jan 2020 #14
I didn't quote you. Renew Deal Jan 2020 #15
You put it in quotes and I have no idea what your "deserve" interest means here. braddy Jan 2020 #16
Do you believe that the iranian terrorist you referenced deserved to be killed? Renew Deal Jan 2020 #17
I don't understand what you are trying to say, deserve? What does that mean when taking out the braddy Jan 2020 #18
Let me simplify Renew Deal Jan 2020 #19
I think that has been made clear, and we may have captured some more bad guys according to some braddy Jan 2020 #20
What has been made clear? Renew Deal Jan 2020 #21
That some bad dudes got smoked because they thought they were invisible... pbmus Jan 2020 #33
Good dance around the question asked. herding cats Jan 2020 #31
You are wasting your time... Thomas Hurt Jan 2020 #52
When were hundreds of Americans killed? choie Jan 2020 #28
I'm trying to figure this out too Bettie Jan 2020 #43
Perhaps you're missing the context of the OP. KY_EnviroGuy Jan 2020 #35
Not good, but trump will likely get away with it because Iranian was in Iraq Hoyt Jan 2020 #9
Assassinating Archduke Frank Ferdinand was an act of war. roamer65 Jan 2020 #10
Why was an Iranian general in Iraq? Generic Brad Jan 2020 #13
I have been hearing on the news tonight that he BigmanPigman Jan 2020 #22
Under the War Powers Act Congress doesn't have to be told or approve nt ripcord Jan 2020 #48
Because he can be in Iraq and no one believes SHIT coming out of the Trump admin so them uponit7771 Jan 2020 #24
Yes. Possibly "Instigate" as opposed to "Initiate" Algernon Moncrieff Jan 2020 #25
He's free to be anywhere he's welcomed and he was welcome. KY_EnviroGuy Jan 2020 #36
Do you think it couold be possible he coordinated the attack on the US base? ripcord Jan 2020 #49
From my meager perch, it's equally possible that you or the pope coordinated it. KY_EnviroGuy Jan 2020 #53
His former advisor is now the Iranian ambassador to Iraq muriel_volestrangler Jan 2020 #37
My question is: melm00se Jan 2020 #54
Arguably, the General's presence in an Iraqi airport could be an act of war against us and/or Iraq Algernon Moncrieff Jan 2020 #23
I have been trying to catch up and this is about where I sit with this. Lexee Jan 2020 #26
No, no-one can argue his presence there was "an act of war" muriel_volestrangler Jan 2020 #38
If I were Iraq, I'd likely say the same thing for public consumption Algernon Moncrieff Jan 2020 #41
So, a military commander from country A can be legally sinkingfeeling Jan 2020 #39
In your scenario: Algernon Moncrieff Jan 2020 #40
It's not 'self defense' you describe; it's "I suspect him, so I shot him" muriel_volestrangler Jan 2020 #45
I think we are about to find out, aren't we? Hekate Jan 2020 #27
It would be especially if he was on his way to a negotiation Pachamama Jan 2020 #29
Not when the general is responsible for terrorist attacks. Don't weep applegrove Jan 2020 #30
This is the smartest thing I've heard all night mahina Jan 2020 #34
This Algernon Moncrieff Jan 2020 #42
They get to choose time and place, now tirebiter Jan 2020 #32
Yes, it is. Iran does not have the capability of attacking MineralMan Jan 2020 #44
And in another country-- dawg day Jan 2020 #46
The Pakistani govt. was really pissed when we took out bin Laden. Kaleva Jan 2020 #50
They can remain pissed Renew Deal Jan 2020 #51
Yes Cosmocat Jan 2020 #56
There's no legal definition that applies brooklynite Jan 2020 #57
Only if it happens to America. lsewpershad Jan 2020 #58
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Is bombing a military gen...»Reply #53