Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Tens Of Thousands Of FEMINISTS Call On CNN To FIRE SEXIST CONTRIBUTOR [View all]Ganja Ninja
(15,953 posts)69. And it isn't just the sexism of it.
It's a smug, pointless, empty headed comment with no meaningful content of any kind. With contributors like this it's no wonder CNN sucks. Three hundred million people in America and this guy is plucked from obscurity to give his opinion on national television? What were they thinking? Surely there must be someone out there that can produce commentary on an adult level.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
71 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
ya, i heard that last night and though again, i thought insulting, i am tired of calling the sexist
seabeyond
Sep 2012
#9
Oh, gosh, if Rachel Maddow had referred to an evening at the RNC as The Penis Parade
mnhtnbb
Sep 2012
#36
i can only guess addressing women as body parts and dismissing womens voice is "manly" time. nt
seabeyond
Sep 2012
#28
what does any of this have to do with "manly" things? unless being a sexist asshole is "manly"
seabeyond
Sep 2012
#26
Since you appear to enjoy his misogynist jokes, here's a few more of Erickson's finest moments
Major Nikon
Sep 2012
#62
I wonder if any of the feminists offended by Erikson have protested Rmoney dressed up as vaginas
badtoworse
Sep 2012
#15