Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)The official Trump line on Soleimani strike starts to unravel [View all]
http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/the-official-trump-line-soleimani-strike-starts-unravel?cid=sm_fb_maddow&fbclid=IwAR29OKM9biOBX2iTDvfhUbcKIlVIv101k37qUCkB0e0IyvciAs9C4_-vIQkThe official Trump line on Soleimani strike starts to unravel
01/06/20 08:00 AM
By Steve Benen
snip//
To be sure, Team Trumps absence of credibility, coupled with the political context, made it difficult to take seriously the White Houses line about an imminent attack, necessitating an immediate assault. But the reporting brings the problem into sharper focus: Team Trumps official story about one of the presidents most dangerous decisions doesnt appear to be true.
All of which leads to an important follow-up question: if the airstrike wasnt needed to prevent an imminent attack, why exactly did the president green-light such a radical offensive?
Trump thought the dangerous new posture would help his weak image. The Washington Post reported over the weekend that the president was motivated to act, at least in part, by what he felt was negative coverage after his 2019 decision to call off the airstrike after Iran downed the U.S. surveillance drone, officials said. Trump was also frustrated that the details of his internal deliberations had leaked out and felt he looked weak, the officials said.
Trump was preoccupied with his predecessor. The same Post report added, The president has long fixated on 2012 attacks on U.S. compounds in Benghazi, Libya, and the Obama administrations response to them, said lawmakers and aides who have spoken to him, and he felt the response to this weeks attack on the embassy and the killing of an American contractor would make him look stronger compared with his predecessor.
With his impeachment trial looming, Trump saw value in wagging the dog. The New York Times Rukmini Callimachi noted that Soleimanis whereabouts have been known before, and his resume of killing-by-proxy is not a secret. So why launch this specific strike, to the surprise of the presidents own team? As Callimachi put it, its difficult to decouple Trumps decision from the from the impeachment saga.
In case this isnt painfully obvious, its a problem that the official White House line is unraveling. Its just as significant a problem that the alternate explanations are indefensible.
17 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
They've had upwards of 30 different excuses/explanations for the Ukraine shakedown
NewJeffCT
Jan 2020
#7