Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Has the democratic party drifted to the right over the past 40 years? [View all]lapucelle
(20,931 posts)60. Yes, indeed, we do have Ralph Nadar to "thank" for The Bush presidency, the Iraq War,
the Roberts / Citizen's United Court, and the current state of our environment.
snip==================================================================================
https://www.nytimes.com/2000/11/03/us/2000-campaign-environment-favorite-issue-gore-finds-himself-2-front-defense.html
No wonder Ralph Nadar received the Nobel Peace Prize for his environmental activism.
[T]he debate has raised questions about how the support that each candidate has voiced for the environment might translate into practice. Mr. Gore, for example, is being backed by most major environmental groups, but in other quarters, his past statement that environmental protection should become ''the central organizing principle for civilization'' is being portrayed by his opponents as evidence of either betrayal or bad judgment.
''This administration tries to take credit for our economy, but they seem to have forgotten what makes it turn,'' Mr. Bush said over the summer, in outlining what he has portrayed as a more practical view. ''Even today, in our new, high-tech economy, America runs on oil and gas and coal gained from the earth and water held behind our dams.''
Mr. Gore still clearly sees the environment as a winning issue, and his campaign has tried to focus attention on Mr. Bush's environmental record in Texas, which Gore aides say should raise deep doubts about the governor's commitment to protection. ''When it comes to the environment, I've never given up, I've never turned back, and I never will,'' Mr. Gore said at recent rallies.
''This administration tries to take credit for our economy, but they seem to have forgotten what makes it turn,'' Mr. Bush said over the summer, in outlining what he has portrayed as a more practical view. ''Even today, in our new, high-tech economy, America runs on oil and gas and coal gained from the earth and water held behind our dams.''
Mr. Gore still clearly sees the environment as a winning issue, and his campaign has tried to focus attention on Mr. Bush's environmental record in Texas, which Gore aides say should raise deep doubts about the governor's commitment to protection. ''When it comes to the environment, I've never given up, I've never turned back, and I never will,'' Mr. Gore said at recent rallies.
snip==================================================================================
''Al Gore is suffering from election-year delusion if he thinks his record on the environment is anything to be proud of,'' Mr. Nader said recently. ''He should be held accountable by voters for eight years of principles betrayed and promises broken.''
Even though the Clinton administration has disappointed them on some issues, such as its failure to tighten automobile fuel-economy, most leading environmentalists have rallied to Mr. Gore. He, more than anyone else, they argue, deserves credit for the administration's environmental achievements. Furthermore, as president, they reason, he would finally have the freedom to put his own agenda in place.
Even though the Clinton administration has disappointed them on some issues, such as its failure to tighten automobile fuel-economy, most leading environmentalists have rallied to Mr. Gore. He, more than anyone else, they argue, deserves credit for the administration's environmental achievements. Furthermore, as president, they reason, he would finally have the freedom to put his own agenda in place.
https://www.nytimes.com/2000/11/03/us/2000-campaign-environment-favorite-issue-gore-finds-himself-2-front-defense.html
No wonder Ralph Nadar received the Nobel Peace Prize for his environmental activism.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
60 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Has the democratic party drifted to the right over the past 40 years? [View all]
redqueen
Dec 2019
OP
Reagan WAS a Democrat until 1962 and in fact he was a strong union advocate at one time:
George II
Dec 2019
#34
Certainly it is more socially liberal but in its heyday the party was economically liberal.
hedda_foil
Dec 2019
#42
Bernie is no FDR, and the country is a very different situation than it was during his
ehrnst
Jan 2020
#50
No. For most of the last 40 years, it held fairly steady. Recently, it's shifted left a bit.
Garrett78
Dec 2019
#10
Absolutely yes in the wake of the Reagan era, but the pendulum has made a swing
bullwinkle428
Dec 2019
#13
Yes, we've been picking up moderate Repubs who have been forced out of their party...
Wounded Bear
Dec 2019
#14
On social policy the Democratic Party has moved steadily left, economically it moved rightwards
andym
Dec 2019
#20
I'd say on environmental policy we have not, and that it was in fact that very thing
redqueen
Dec 2019
#22
Yes, indeed, we do have Ralph Nadar to "thank" for The Bush presidency, the Iraq War,
lapucelle
Jan 2020
#60
Democratic party did what it had to do to compete with filthy, disgusting cheaters
Eliot Rosewater
Dec 2019
#27
Campaign finance, including dark money has affected our whole political landscape.
Dustlawyer
Dec 2019
#29