Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: ****LIVE IMPEACHMENT TRIAL 1/24/20 THREAD 1**** [View all]BumRushDaShow
(170,591 posts)79. The House Impeachment Managers have divided up the case into portions
1.) Arguing each impeachment Article - they are completing Article I now (Article II will be next)
2.) Article I was basically "Abuse of Power".
3.) For the Abuse of Power, they have had each Manager, in a chronological fashion (I think starting back in April 2019 and working their way until the present) walk through every action as a narrative -
the requiring of a fake "investigation" against a political rival by Ukraine in exchange for a meeting and funding the subsequent holding of the Ukraine aid to carry out the threat if an investigation wasn't done the coverup of evidence (classifying a call transcript and manufacturing a justification for holding the aid) - which was exposed and showed that what they were doing was illegal, only coming out once Congress was finally given notice of a whistleblower report, and that notice was was reported in the news
4.) To show proof of "abuse of power", they included testimony clips, news interview clips, texts, emails, and call transcripts, that established - 1) what was happening, 2) who was doing what 3.) what the result was 4) and why the actions that were carried out by the President, his staff, and his lawyers, resulted in an abuse of power.
5.) They then chronologically went through the above showing how the Constitution defined these actions as impeachable and how that compared with past impeachments
6.) And now they are arguing why what was done is so egregious that it requires removal from office as a penalty - due to the President being a national security risk.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
97 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Not sure - Am guessing Turtle will let us know before today's session ends
BumRushDaShow
Jan 2020
#3
Adam Schiff up providing the upcoming arguments - Jason Crow will be up first
BumRushDaShow
Jan 2020
#11
Jason Crow (D-CO) is continuing the argument of "corrupt intent" with respect to the Ukraine aid
BumRushDaShow
Jan 2020
#12
Clips of Vindman's and Morrison's testimony about concerns re: phone call
Hermit-The-Prog
Jan 2020
#31
Jeffries now going into the coverup - the call transcript being put on the highly
BumRushDaShow
Jan 2020
#34
oops! sorry, cop, we accidently built that brick wall around that body.
Hermit-The-Prog
Jan 2020
#35
Slide: White House Knew of Whistle-Blower's Allegations Soon After Trump's Call With Ukraine Leader
Mersky
Jan 2020
#40
Jeffries- an amazing speech about our "great nation" -"What are we going to do about our character?"
BumRushDaShow
Jan 2020
#48
Crow is bringing up how many times Bolton told his direct reports and others
BumRushDaShow
Jan 2020
#53
Sondland's stipulating release of aid for Ukrainian announcement of an investigation
Mersky
Jan 2020
#54
Schiff quotes George Schultz, leave a garden for 6 months you get weeds ...
Hermit-The-Prog
Jan 2020
#78
Schiff - maybe we need a revolution of dignity, a revolution of civility ...
Hermit-The-Prog
Jan 2020
#87
Schiff continues to hammer on consequences here, Ukraine, elsewhere ...
Hermit-The-Prog
Jan 2020
#88