Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(14,162 posts)

10. Not one that the senate can't override

Fri Jan 31, 2020, 02:42 PM

Jan 2020

with another majority vote. Then 50-50 would be a no although it could delay thngs a little. That's how I understand it anyway. I'm not a lawyer.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

14 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Is it really over? [View all] gab13by13 Jan 2020 OP

50-50 is a no. defacto7 Jan 2020 #1

Explain for those of us who didn't know this nt Sunsky Jan 2020 #5

murkowski is voting no on witnesses spanone Jan 2020 #11

I heard that Sunsky Jan 2020 #12

The CJ presides...doesn't interject...or show his hand. AncientGeezer Jan 2020 #13

Roberts is presiding Zolorp Jan 2020 #8

Not one that the senate can't override defacto7 Jan 2020 #10

No not really...Presiding Officers don't break ties.. AncientGeezer Jan 2020 #14

We can only guess. BKDem Jan 2020 #2

Not so sure about Roberts, gab13by13 Jan 2020 #3

That doesn't seem to bother 49 other repugs Wednesdays Jan 2020 #6

Is he though? Bettie Jan 2020 #7

As my glbt sisters and brothers reminded me often gratuitous Jan 2020 #4

Murkowski spent a private 30 minutes with McConnell a few days ago Bayard Jan 2020 #9