Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

tinrobot

(12,068 posts)
4. The number is actually not an 'average', it is a sum
Sat Feb 1, 2020, 12:01 AM
Feb 2020

They add up all the values of the stocks to get the price of the index. On top of that, they have to correct for things such as stock splits, so the stocks are multiplied by a number that correlates to those shifts in price. They also have to account for companies that fall out of the index and are replaced by new ones. Some companies have been in the index for 80+ years, some less than a decade.

Needless to say, it gets complex. Overall, it is not a good index to judge the overall health of the economy. I think the reason it is used is simply because it is the oldest index still in use, so it roughly represents a historical record going back to the late 1890's.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Dow Jones Industrial Aver...»Reply #4