It's ridiculous that each state gets two Senators, regardless of population...

[treestar]

55. Since states are not equal in size, it's always going to be unfair

but ironically it is to "protect" small states and now it turns out it gives small states the disproportionate power. The House can be dominated by people from large states (though they won't all be the same, not every California house member is a liberal Democrat and there can be a liberal from urban areas of a red state). But the Senate advantages small population states over large, which is not really a big improvement.

Theorizing about a solution, it might involve not letting the Senate block legislation by not voting on it, not using the filibuster, and not being able to block an overwhelming House vote.