Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Never count on the rich Cartoonist Feb 2020 #1
It also hits companies who currently avoid federal taxes altogether. redqueen Feb 2020 #2
It wasn't just one item. Cartoonist Feb 2020 #8
VAT alone is regressive. VAT+UBI is very progressive. nt redqueen Feb 2020 #9
In the EU the value added tax is about 15%. It's a sales tax so it comradebillyboy Feb 2020 #3
Businesses sell to each other as well. Many very profitable businesses do not pay any federal taxes redqueen Feb 2020 #7
"Value added tax is a consumption tax because it is borne ultimately by the final consumer. comradebillyboy Feb 2020 #10
In theory yes. In practice no. redqueen Feb 2020 #11
The point is that most of it then comes back to everyone via the UBI muriel_volestrangler Feb 2020 #13
In the US we have neither UBI nor VAT. Good luck enacting a comradebillyboy Feb 2020 #14
You don't have Medicare for All, either muriel_volestrangler Feb 2020 #16
What you say is true. PETRUS Feb 2020 #17
Yes, I prefer separate taxes for the financial industry issues. redqueen Feb 2020 #18
Yeah, I also think an FTT is a good idea. PETRUS Feb 2020 #19
Thanks! redqueen Feb 2020 #20
Why cant we just legalize a definitional distinction between income and wages? Volaris Feb 2020 #21
Because lobbyists. redqueen Feb 2020 #27
Thanks for the info. safeinOhio Feb 2020 #4
One wonders why we don't already have it, since it hits businesses so effectively. redqueen Feb 2020 #6
I imagine a lot of voters wouldn't be in favor of a national sales tax on everything they buy? MichMan Feb 2020 #12
It can be tailored to exempt necessities redqueen Feb 2020 #15
If it were SPECIFICALLY APPLIED to paying off the national debt, I'd be in favor of that. Volaris Feb 2020 #22
Do you think it would be a winning issue for a campaign? MichMan Feb 2020 #23
The gop makes hay out of the national debt n deficit whenever a democratic occupant Volaris Feb 2020 #24
Right? redqueen Feb 2020 #25
That won't help people. redqueen Feb 2020 #26
This message was self-deleted by its author Cartoonist Feb 2020 #5
I don't know where Brookings are coming from in saying that VAT is a "progressive" tax. The rich OnDoutside Feb 2020 #28
Read it again - VAT + UBI progressive redqueen Feb 2020 #29
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»How a VAT could tax the r...»Reply #22