Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

defacto7

(14,162 posts)

5. No, if you want to make it such a broad brush. I didn't.

Reply to ancianita (Reply #2)

Tue Feb 4, 2020, 12:47 PM

Feb 2020

I've worked in net security and development practically since the beginning. The potential for this outcome has always been there and understood. It's followed it's course and hasn't changed either technologically or sociologically from the earliest predictions. Yes, this outcome was only a matter of time. Of course one always hopes for some great discovery but there are no miracles in math.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

7 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Warning from Electronic Frontier Foundation: the formation of a global surveillance police state. [View all] ancianita Feb 2020 OP

It was only a matter of time. defacto7 Feb 2020 #1

Oh here we go with the politics of inevitability. Was it? Really? You can say that about ancianita Feb 2020 #2

No, if you want to make it such a broad brush. I didn't. defacto7 Feb 2020 #5

You left me no choice. You could have said why to begin with, then I wouldn't have had ancianita Feb 2020 #6

I appreciate your answer. 'Read it twice. defacto7 Feb 2020 #7

Wasn't this a season of Homeland? SoCalNative Feb 2020 #3

No. None of this surveillance capability ever existed. We're in the reality of the 21st ancianita Feb 2020 #4