Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Awsi Dooger

(14,565 posts)
37. Depth means absolutely nothing in a field of presidential candidates
Sat Feb 8, 2020, 04:42 PM
Feb 2020

You either have the ideal nominee or you don't.

Our 2020 field was always troubled because nobody had the ideal blueprint...not even close. I have mentioned that many times. Issues don't matter at all. You need someone who has the correct combination of age and charisma and gender and bio.

If Amy were a male we'd be in great shape. Or we'd be in great shape if Pete were older, more experienced and especially if he were heterosexual. It is ridiculous to dodge that final variable. Once we leave our own primaries we don't want to be startled when our nominee is rejected by a vital few percent we desperately need. Maybe in 2060 a gay man can be elected president. It's not happening in 2020, especially against an incumbent.

Bloomberg indeed owns the best combination to defeat Trump. I have mentioned many times in "Primaries" that among a shuttle bus of older white folks in Naples last November while attending an LPGA golf tournament I heard the other passengers discussing the Democratic field. I was surprised when they were willing to consider a Democrat above Trump. But not any Democrat. Everyone except Biden and Bloomberg was dismissed as, "too far out there," meaning too liberal. They agreed that the only two Democrats they would consider are Biden and Bloomberg. Then the most vocal guy said, "Biden is not too far out there. He has that going for him. But he often sounds confused. Not Bloomberg. He's in his 70s but is still very sharp." To my amazement, others loudly agreed. Immediately agreed.

Granted it's anecdotal but I have learned to pay attention to what I hear at golf tournaments. It's an older white crowd and they vote. I knew throughout 2016 that Donald Trump had far greater opportunity than most were giving him, based on everything I was hearing while attending those golf tournaments during the spring.

The OP's crypt summary of Biden is also unfortunately accurate, in fact more accurate than I preferred to believe at the time. It would be a dominant mocking theme of a fall campaign.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I'm coming around to Bloomberg [View all] extvbroadcaster Feb 2020 OP
Sorry to hear all that. LakeArenal Feb 2020 #1
I will vote for whoever the Democratic candidate is Just_Vote_Dem Feb 2020 #2
I'm still with Joe calguy Feb 2020 #3
We all may have to FBaggins Feb 2020 #4
Wrong forum. Kingofalldems Feb 2020 #5
Yes. Repost in Primary. mnhtnbb Feb 2020 #10
If he's the candidate, I'll vote for him. tavernier Feb 2020 #6
He's self funded, so no donors. Thought the debate rules had polls and number of donors...that's my KewlKat Feb 2020 #17
I may be with you there, but this post belongs in the Primary forum. Crunchy Frog Feb 2020 #7
That does seem to gloss over a key detail quakerboy Feb 2020 #8
I hope you're wrong about the woman thing. aeromanKC Feb 2020 #9
You were stopped and asked a question when trying to post in General Discussion lunasun Feb 2020 #11
respect your opinon stopdiggin Feb 2020 #12
So the list of people who cannot beat Trump is sarisataka Feb 2020 #13
Amazing how we couldn't find a strong candidate in this year of all years. tman Feb 2020 #14
I'm not a fan, be we need to accept he's a credible candidate Azathoth Feb 2020 #15
I will 100% support whoever wins the nomination Johnny2X2X Feb 2020 #16
Take it to Primaries blogslut Feb 2020 #18
538 has him at 1% to win.. flamingdem Feb 2020 #19
Bloomberg is paying influencers Bradshaw3 Feb 2020 #20
one of the nanny types is rushing to get this thread shutdown Demovictory9 Feb 2020 #21
why do you call people wanting the rules enforced "nannies"?????? CatWoman Feb 2020 #24
It's not being a "nanny type" to want to keep the knock down drag out fights in a separate room Hekate Feb 2020 #25
As someone called to juries VERY often ... and nearly always choosing to leave the post alone ... mr_lebowski Feb 2020 #29
Vote Blue no matter who. Now please move this to the Primaries forum. Hekate Feb 2020 #22
Yup. jeffreyi Feb 2020 #23
Step 1: Vote for the Democrat, even if necessary to hold nose. Beartracks Feb 2020 #30
This post belongs in the Democratic primaries forum Sunsky Feb 2020 #26
Message auto-removed Name removed Feb 2020 #27
I wish I could proclaim this to be an unreasonable calculation ... mr_lebowski Feb 2020 #28
Depth means absolutely nothing in a field of presidential candidates Awsi Dooger Feb 2020 #37
Bloomberg is growing on me. dem4decades Feb 2020 #31
if he is the candidate, I will vote for Bloomberg. I will even vote for Bernie librechik Feb 2020 #32
Beware of Bloomberg Crazyleftie Feb 2020 #33
False DarthDem Feb 2020 #36
I especially agree with your last paragraph pandr32 Feb 2020 #34
Bloomberg is electable and is currently my second choice Gothmog Feb 2020 #35
Locking JudyM Feb 2020 #38
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I'm coming around to Bloo...»Reply #37