Why assume that Obama would be more benevolent? (Reply #13)

In the discussion thread: Obama on drones and extrajudicial killing [View all]

Fri Sep 7, 2012, 04:28 PM

DerekG (2,935 posts)

13. Why assume that Obama would be more benevolent?

All but one of our major 20th century wars were waged by Democratic administrations, and several of the chief executives were fairly progressive.

I doesn't make a bit of difference whether our pseudo tyrant is a donkey or elephant.

Reply to this post

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum

Replies to this discussion thread

13 replies	Author	Time	Post
Obama on drones and extrajudicial killing [View all]	MadHound	Sep 2012	OP
I agree completely & totally.	CrispyQ	Sep 2012	#1
And with whom do we have a better chance of putting that genie back in the bottle?	MadHound	Sep 2012	#2
I don't believe we'll ever get that genie back in the bottle.	CrispyQ	Sep 2012	#4
Well, we'd better,	MadHound	Sep 2012	#5
Why assume that Obama would be more benevolent?	DerekG	Sep 2012	#13
K&R Wake the hell up, America.	woo me with science	Sep 2012	#3
I think "the public"	Le Taz Hot	Sep 2012	#6
It's America's new Wonder Weapon designed to make us look like we didn't lose another war.	Tierra_y_Libertad	Sep 2012	#7
This statement	ProSense	Sep 2012	#8
Just because a law dates to Clinton doesn't make it right,	MadHound	Sep 2012	#9
Naive much?	ProSense	Sep 2012	#11
No, these countries file formal protests,	MadHound	Sep 2012	#12
I agree, but this horse has been out of the barn for almost five decades.	hifiguy	Sep 2012	#10

Edit History

Please login to view edit histories.