Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Is continual exposure to hateful propaganda child abuse? [View all]Major Nikon
(36,925 posts)92. They still do, just to a lesser extent
They still teach that "sin" = shame. Even if they didn't, Methodists and other less conservative churches represent only a very small percentage in the US. The Catholic church alone has almost 9 times more members than the Methodists do.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
118 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
The only thing wrong about it is that it shouldn't have been limited to just the South
Major Nikon
Sep 2012
#90
I don't think it helps us to include inflamatory language as we converse.
LiberalAndProud
Sep 2012
#45
Child abuse as defined by the criminal law, absolutely NOT. Not in the child's best interest,
kelly1mm
Sep 2012
#41
OK, you start. Go ahead and knock on the window of that car with Rush blaring with a kid
kelly1mm
Sep 2012
#60
I think "hateful propaganda" by Big Money corporations is probably related more to "marketing".
Trillo
Sep 2012
#68
If you are not advocating government involvement, then drop the term child abuse,
MadHound
Sep 2012
#85
where did that 16-year-old girl learn to suggest assassination of Obama? n/t
grasswire
Sep 2012
#107