Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: FDL: Obama’s Pentagon Strategy: A Leaner, More Efficient Empire [View all]BeFree
(23,843 posts)8. Good on FDL
Empire is our biggest problem after environmental destruction and global climate change.
I am so glad some of the press has balls enough to bring the truth. The rest of the media is hog-swallowing.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
83 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
FDL: Obama’s Pentagon Strategy: A Leaner, More Efficient Empire [View all]
Luminous Animal
Jan 2012
OP
Lunatic is being so overused, I now read it as "someone I disagree with but I
Luminous Animal
Jan 2012
#5
And of course the irony of using a GOP talking point like "lunatic Green Party Member"
villager
Jan 2012
#14
I have personally never heard a Republican or GOP operative ever mention the Green Party
emulatorloo
Jan 2012
#37
Gosh, well if *you personally* have never heard it, that negates all the times I've been called such
villager
Jan 2012
#83
Lunatic Green Party members like Medea Benjamin who was often the only dissenting voice
EFerrari
Jan 2012
#53
Obama could announce a cure for cancer and FDL would assume he is promoting a drug for big pharma.
DCBob
Jan 2012
#74
He is reducing the growth of the defense budget primarily with personnel
Luminous Animal
Jan 2012
#10
Unfortunately Republicans don't feel safe unless we spend copious amounts of money that
think
Jan 2012
#78
No disagreement there. Bush nearly doubled the war budget and Dems should not feel obligated
think
Jan 2012
#82
I'm sorry, that doesn't answer the question. Perhaps I should be more specific.
JackRiddler
Jan 2012
#58
An analogy: I have read several Glenn Beck rants. They are full of fact twisting, half-truths,
emulatorloo
Jan 2012
#39
It's not about Obama, every US President is in the business of maintaing the US Empire.
Puregonzo1188
Jan 2012
#40
Funny, when Bush was President there all these posts about how many US bases around the world, list
Puregonzo1188
Jan 2012
#55
Obama tried really hard to keep US troops in longer, but couldn't get immunity.
Puregonzo1188
Jan 2012
#60
If those meddling kids at wikileaks hadn't shown that damn video we'd still be spreading democracy
think
Jan 2012
#76
It's sort of surprising that this piece doesn't talk about Obama's fondness for JSOC
EFerrari
Jan 2012
#51
To a leaner more efficient empire! Doesn't look much different, except it costs more. K&R (nt)
T S Justly
Jan 2012
#64
Trans: We're still going to give loads of money to the MIC but say we're not.
Tierra_y_Libertad
Jan 2012
#80