Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Response to Upthevibe (Original post)

Post removed

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

38 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

We need to flood Chief John Roberts' office with calls.... [View all] Upthevibe Feb 2020 OP

Yes. Call reps and senators. blm Feb 2020 #1

Okay...Here we go: Upthevibe Feb 2020 #4

✔️ blm Feb 2020 #5

Post removed Post removed Feb 2020 #2

Inundating the Supreme Court phone operators is NOT the way to go, imo, elleng Feb 2020 #3

Really!!!!!?????? "Put something in writing".... Upthevibe Feb 2020 #7

Will get the operators' attention, and the ire, if anything, of the Supremes. elleng Feb 2020 #10

Yes, it will make the regular jobs of ordinary federal employees more difficult The Velveteen Ocelot Feb 2020 #34

Zacly. elleng Feb 2020 #38

+ struggle4progress Feb 2020 #18

Waste of time SCantiGOP Feb 2020 #6

Judge Jackson has got this. Frasier Balzov Feb 2020 #8

I agree completely with your assessment. WheelWalker Feb 2020 #16

Roberts is a puke all the way Blues Heron Feb 2020 #9

The kind of judge whose role isn't that of a judge? onenote Feb 2020 #12

wrong - he's still allegedly a judge - the top in the land Blues Heron Feb 2020 #13

Wrong.His role is that of the presiding officer. Not a judge. onenote Feb 2020 #14

Yes I know - we all heard that spiel a million times during the "trial" Blues Heron Feb 2020 #15

You disagree with it? is that supposed to be convincing? onenote Feb 2020 #17

read my post again Blues Heron Feb 2020 #20

Please point to Article and Section of the Constitution which supports this. Hermit-The-Prog Feb 2020 #21

It says the chief Justice will preside Blues Heron Feb 2020 #24

Article I, Section 3 Hermit-The-Prog Feb 2020 #27

again - it's silent on specifics Blues Heron Feb 2020 #28

No, it is very specific. The Senate shall have the sole power [...] Hermit-The-Prog Feb 2020 #30

You got one thing right: as the presiding officer at the impeachment onenote Feb 2020 #23

so you think it was ceremonial - where does the constitution say that? Blues Heron Feb 2020 #25

So you think Mike Pence should exercise the powers of a judge onenote Feb 2020 #32

I expect hime to preside fairly over the trial- that means speaking up if the pukes Blues Heron Feb 2020 #36

No! why harass the government workers who answer the phone ? 4139 Feb 2020 #11

I thought the legislative branch of government was accountable to the people Nature Man Feb 2020 #19

That is correct. SCOTUS is meant to be free from pressure from public opinion ehrnst Feb 2020 #33

Um, no DeminPennswoods Feb 2020 #22

no handmade34 Feb 2020 #26

Do it Blues Heron Feb 2020 #29

Call your Reps, that's their job. The reason that SCOTUS justices are not elected is so they would ehrnst Feb 2020 #31

The Supreme Court will not involve itself in a case that might come before them. The Velveteen Ocelot Feb 2020 #35

Kick blm Feb 2020 #37