Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

duforsure

(11,885 posts)

33. She wants to hear why they changed

Reply to Dennis Donovan (Reply #7)

Mon Feb 17, 2020, 04:38 AM

Feb 2020

Their position so suddenly, and hear their excuses now they've made up for her. This will be interesting when she responds on Thursday to them for doing this. Will she allow them to corrupt the sentencing? Lets hope not, and instead makes an example of them, or next time it will be much worse.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

34 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

BREAKING: Stone judge calling for "on the record" ph conf 2 days before sentencing [View all] Dennis Donovan Feb 2020 OP

It looks like she doesn't want to just roll over, I didn't think dewsgirl Feb 2020 #1

Wonder what kind of threats she is getting and from where? triron Feb 2020 #4

I've been thinking about this, I'm sure many. I have no doubt, dewsgirl Feb 2020 #8

limbaugh is/was the master at ginning up death threats certainot Feb 2020 #21

That was an infuriating read, I forget how awful he is dewsgirl Feb 2020 #22

thanks for reading! his possible departure from the airwaves it should be a major story certainot Feb 2020 #23

Look where his denial has got him, cigarettes aren't bad, blah, blah. dewsgirl Feb 2020 #24

Also: "I'm not addicted to oxycontin!" dawg day Feb 2020 #26

So much talk about him lately, I forgot all about his opioid addiction. dewsgirl Feb 2020 #34

"On the record" tells me she's ready to read DoJ and Barr the Riot Act Dennis Donovan Feb 2020 #7

🤞🤞🤞 dewsgirl Feb 2020 #9

That's how I read it. 2naSalit Feb 2020 #32

She wants to hear why they changed duforsure Feb 2020 #33

What's she got up her sleeve? triron Feb 2020 #2

THAT should be interesting! eom Maeve Feb 2020 #3

I wonder if she wants a record of who will appear in case more resignations rzemanfl Feb 2020 #5

Maybe she wants to know what attorney is left to represent the government on this case. Sanity Claws Feb 2020 #6

CALLING THEM OUT--literally. What a thing of beauty! slumcamper Feb 2020 #10

Darn, I would like to get the number and password to listen in. EOM tiredtoo Feb 2020 #11

Bet she is displeased will all their last minute delay tactic shenanigans wishstar Feb 2020 #12

Probably will be addressing the new motion for a new trial onenote Feb 2020 #13

Yes! This is really bad news for the DOJ and Stone's lawyers, you can bet on that! machoneman Feb 2020 #14

I'll take that bet. onenote Feb 2020 #15

The sentencing is not going to happen on February 20. Sneederbunk Feb 2020 #16

what i would do if i were her......... Takket Feb 2020 #17

Great news malaise Feb 2020 #18

Actually, it may be terrible news. onenote Feb 2020 #30

Judge is such a tease!!!!!! Can't wait to see what's up her sleeve! Karadeniz Feb 2020 #19

My perspective on conference calls Fritz Walter Feb 2020 #20

I don't see the need for a conference call hangaleft Feb 2020 #25

It's a scheduling call, presumably to discuss the new motion for a new trial onenote Feb 2020 #27

Understood hangaleft Feb 2020 #28

While the motion is sealed, presumably it claims the jury forewoman hid her bias during voir dire onenote Feb 2020 #29

I get it hangaleft Feb 2020 #31