Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

CousinIT

(12,789 posts)
Thu Feb 20, 2020, 08:54 AM Feb 2020

MEDICARE FOR ALL WOULD SAVE $450 BILLION ANNUALLY WHILE PREVENTING 68,000 DEATHS, NEW STUDY SHOWS [View all]

This discussion thread was locked as off-topic by JudyM (a host of the General Discussion forum).

(sorry for damn Newsweek all-caps headlines)

https://www.newsweek.com/medicare-all-would-save-450-billion-annually-while-preventing-68000-deaths-new-study-shows-1487862

The Medicare For All plan proposed by Democratic presidential candidates Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren would save taxpayers hundreds of billions of dollars each year and would prevent tens of thousands of unnecessary deaths, a new study shows.

The analysis, conducted by researchers at Yale University, the University of Florida and the University of Maryland, found that transitioning the U.S. to a single-payer health care system would actually save an estimated $450 billion each year, with the average American family seeing about $2,400 in annual savings. The research, which was published Saturday in the medical journal The Lancet, also found that Medicare for all would prevent about 68,000 unnecessary deaths per year.

"Our study is actually conservative because it doesn't factor in the lives saved among underinsured Americans—which includes anyone who nominally has insurance but has postponed or foregone care because they couldn't afford the copays and deductibles," Alison Galvani, an author of the study and researcher at the Center for Infectious Disease Modeling and Analysis at the Yale School of Public Health, told Newsweek.

Overall, the new research anticipates annual savings of about 13 percent in national health care costs, while providing better health care access to lower-income families. According to the study, about 37 million Americans do not have health insurance, while an additional 41 million people do not have adequate health care coverage. Taken together, about 24 percent of the total population does not have health care coverage that meets their needs.

"The entire system could be funded with less financial outlay than is incurred by employers and households paying for health-care premiums combined with existing government allocations," the authors wrote in the study.

The authors also noted, as Sanders often does when discussing Medicare for all, that health care expenditures in the U.S. are "higher" per capita "than in any other country."
38 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
And would take away the amazing healthcare I already have Loki Liesmith Feb 2020 #1
So long as you have yours . . . Nature Man Feb 2020 #2
Thanks for illustrating another main problem with it. Insulting 150 million people R B Garr Feb 2020 #9
Nobody advocating a public option doesn't think that others should be covered brooklynite Feb 2020 #37
And replace it something better, The horrors! Voltaire2 Feb 2020 #4
on average is the operating word drray23 Feb 2020 #14
On average is the operative word. Voltaire2 Feb 2020 #15
I know people who work for Blue Cross and can not afford it. Oppaloopa Feb 2020 #22
I work for a top 3 berksdem Feb 2020 #36
You obviously love paying for private jets, mansions, skyscrapers and golden parachutes. Hermit-The-Prog Feb 2020 #6
Yeah, screw everyone else nobuddy Feb 2020 #8
You are so right. Look at the responses -- nothing but petty insults. R B Garr Feb 2020 #11
150 million people love their crappy private health Voltaire2 Feb 2020 #16
Look at the union workers in Nevada who don't want crappy promises of M4all R B Garr Feb 2020 #20
+1000 ehrnst Feb 2020 #21
I have great health insurance... Blue_playwright Feb 2020 #35
It's amazing cannabis_flower Feb 2020 #23
Ah yes, the "I have mine so screw you" approach to health care. Hopefully you never lose yours. LonePirate Feb 2020 #28
Why would it do that? edhopper Feb 2020 #29
How amazing is it? Perseus Feb 2020 #31
no thank you. I dont want a crazy president to put my healthcare in a spending bill with the wall... samnsara Feb 2020 #3
Supplement plans & Advantage plans could remain CousinIT Feb 2020 #5
Your existing "healthcare" is sliced up for maximum profit. Hermit-The-Prog Feb 2020 #10
You sound like cannabis_flower Feb 2020 #25
No, read again -- it's the opposite of your assertion. Hermit-The-Prog Feb 2020 #33
A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush. Progressive dog Feb 2020 #7
Under the British plan cannabis_flower Feb 2020 #27
Yes... but you don't do it in one big ax of a plan.... ashredux Feb 2020 #12
Bingo. And the longer you hold out for all-or-nothing, the longer you have nothing. R B Garr Feb 2020 #13
+1000 Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Feb 2020 #17
Easy way to fix uppercase headlines or other text: sl8 Feb 2020 #18
Good to know IronLionZion Feb 2020 #26
Without the ACA subsidy, two people in their 60s could pay $22,000 a year for an HMO plan Auggie Feb 2020 #19
The insurance industry will suffer bucolic_frolic Feb 2020 #24
When cars were invented cannabis_flower Feb 2020 #30
What I'm saying is bucolic_frolic Feb 2020 #34
A shouting headline snowybirdie Feb 2020 #32
Locking JudyM Feb 2020 #38
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»MEDICARE FOR ALL WOULD SA...