Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Judge says sentencing recommendation should be higher because Stone threatened witness [View all]malaise
(296,705 posts)38. She's addressing the Con, Congress and Stone and defending the Judicial Branch
Her address should be made public for everyone to hear.
This is way more important than whether th Con pardons her or not.
Seven fucking charges - this is no witch hunt.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
66 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Judge says sentencing recommendation should be higher because Stone threatened witness [View all]
malaise
Feb 2020
OP
Fair enough, but it's not a threat against the person, it's against their property ...
mr_lebowski
Feb 2020
#63
I'll go with the Judge's opinion - she has way more legal experience than I.
lagomorph777
Feb 2020
#64
I believe the context here is that Stone's saying he's going to sue the dude so hard ...
mr_lebowski
Feb 2020
#65
Threats of legal action might be legal, except if they look like witness tampering.
lagomorph777
Feb 2020
#66
& BARR's team *agrees* w judge (CNN) - judges go "under" guidelines, this one gave MANAFORT
UTUSN
Feb 2020
#11
"incendiary activity is what he's known for, not Roger-being-Roger - justice can't just stand by"
UTUSN
Feb 2020
#12
BARR's team told the court the mess wasn't the previous team's fault, refused to say who
UTUSN
Feb 2020
#18
STONE's atty asked judge for zero time. STONE said he won't make statement. Court on break.
UTUSN
Feb 2020
#20
Wow. Looks like lawyer wars are ramping up. A bit of relief during stressful months ahead.
ancianita
Feb 2020
#25
"Judge is giving STONE a tongue lashing" - probation not enough, all his fault not prosecution's
UTUSN
Feb 2020
#36
"She's addressing (SHITLER), too" - not just STONE, standing up for the prosecutors
UTUSN
Feb 2020
#37
Correct. Trump can preemptively pardon him in the same way that Ford pardoned Nixon.
totodeinhere
Feb 2020
#47