Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: FDL: Obama’s Pentagon Strategy: A Leaner, More Efficient Empire [View all]JackRiddler
(24,979 posts)31. So to quote you, which is it, "cut spending" or "slow growth"?!
Obama said yesterday:
Over the next ten years, the growth in the defense budget will slow, but the fact of the matter is thisit will still grow, because we have global responsibilities that demand our leadership. In fact, the defense budget will still be larger than it was toward the end of the Bush Administration. And I firmly believe, and I think the American people understand, that we can keep our military strongand our nation securewith a defense budget that continues to be larger than roughly the next 10 countries combined.
"Still grow," "still be larger." As he says, this is not a cut. Who am I going to believe, his words or your spin?
Cuts in planned future growth are not cuts in actual spending. Spending will stay the same or possibly grow, depending on supplementary war budgets and the rate of inflation. The absolute dollar amount will not be cut.
Note: Pretend incomprehension is not an answer. "Hmmmm?" and "What?" and other items of miscellaneous snark are not answers. Engage the facts. Earn your snark.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
83 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
FDL: Obama’s Pentagon Strategy: A Leaner, More Efficient Empire [View all]
Luminous Animal
Jan 2012
OP
Lunatic is being so overused, I now read it as "someone I disagree with but I
Luminous Animal
Jan 2012
#5
And of course the irony of using a GOP talking point like "lunatic Green Party Member"
villager
Jan 2012
#14
I have personally never heard a Republican or GOP operative ever mention the Green Party
emulatorloo
Jan 2012
#37
Gosh, well if *you personally* have never heard it, that negates all the times I've been called such
villager
Jan 2012
#83
Lunatic Green Party members like Medea Benjamin who was often the only dissenting voice
EFerrari
Jan 2012
#53
Obama could announce a cure for cancer and FDL would assume he is promoting a drug for big pharma.
DCBob
Jan 2012
#74
He is reducing the growth of the defense budget primarily with personnel
Luminous Animal
Jan 2012
#10
Unfortunately Republicans don't feel safe unless we spend copious amounts of money that
think
Jan 2012
#78
No disagreement there. Bush nearly doubled the war budget and Dems should not feel obligated
think
Jan 2012
#82
I'm sorry, that doesn't answer the question. Perhaps I should be more specific.
JackRiddler
Jan 2012
#58
An analogy: I have read several Glenn Beck rants. They are full of fact twisting, half-truths,
emulatorloo
Jan 2012
#39
It's not about Obama, every US President is in the business of maintaing the US Empire.
Puregonzo1188
Jan 2012
#40
Funny, when Bush was President there all these posts about how many US bases around the world, list
Puregonzo1188
Jan 2012
#55
Obama tried really hard to keep US troops in longer, but couldn't get immunity.
Puregonzo1188
Jan 2012
#60
If those meddling kids at wikileaks hadn't shown that damn video we'd still be spreading democracy
think
Jan 2012
#76
It's sort of surprising that this piece doesn't talk about Obama's fondness for JSOC
EFerrari
Jan 2012
#51
To a leaner more efficient empire! Doesn't look much different, except it costs more. K&R (nt)
T S Justly
Jan 2012
#64
Trans: We're still going to give loads of money to the MIC but say we're not.
Tierra_y_Libertad
Jan 2012
#80