Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DiverDave

(5,245 posts)
17. So, since I don't believe
Mon Feb 24, 2020, 07:13 PM
Feb 2020

In your sky god, I have to work your holy days?
Your rights end where mine begin.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

If he doesn't want to work on Sundays, he can Ilsa Feb 2020 #1
My Hobby Lobby beef: Why did SCotUS let them get away with the birth control thing? UTUSN Feb 2020 #2
because they're a business unblock Feb 2020 #4
Whew, thanks!1 When I saw there was a Reply I thought some high flown Legal authority here UTUSN Feb 2020 #5
On my 2nd thought, digesting your nuanced posts, you support the individual bucking Walgreens,no? UTUSN Feb 2020 #18
well, now that i've read a bit more of the actual facts of the case, unblock Feb 2020 #21
At least you're judicious opining unlike those who scourge me !1 UTUSN Feb 2020 #22
Saturday shanti Feb 2020 #7
i think the "religious liberty" argument has been overused/abused recently, unblock Feb 2020 #3
The underlying facts of this case are described in the 11th circuit opinion onenote Feb 2020 #9
thanks. i can see why the supreme court refused to consider this case unblock Feb 2020 #11
Walgreen's has no obligation to comply with imaginary laws from an imaginary deity. Midnight Writer Feb 2020 #6
uh, no, actually, that's not correct at all. unblock Feb 2020 #8
So any person professing to be Christian should not have to work on a Sunday? Midnight Writer Feb 2020 #12
i get that there's room for fraud in practice, but legally, it has to be a sincerely held belief unblock Feb 2020 #13
"if they (employer) had reason to believe"? So, it is up to the employer? Midnight Writer Feb 2020 #15
your seething contempt for religious views does not lend itself to cogent constitutional analysis. unblock Feb 2020 #16
So, since I don't believe DiverDave Feb 2020 #17
what right of yours is being infringed? unblock Feb 2020 #20
So I'm a BIGOT? DiverDave Feb 2020 #24
Awesome! I'm on "ingnore"! Not sure what that is but sounds cool! unblock Feb 2020 #25
This is actually the employee's fault. He took a position that requires "urgent" training sessions. Coventina Feb 2020 #19
i can see that argument, which is why i can see why the supreme court decided not to hear the case unblock Feb 2020 #23
If you accept a critical position in a company, crying religious exemption is bullshit. Coventina Feb 2020 #26
I don't think it's unreasonable to expect the employer to call the other trainers unblock Feb 2020 #27
Every job I've ever had, and most of the jobs my friends and family have Coventina Feb 2020 #28
You're not addressing any constitutional question unblock Feb 2020 #29
Of course it was an undue burden! It was time-critical training that had to be done in a few days. Coventina Feb 2020 #30
Perfectly faithful to their practice of corporatocracy Raven123 Feb 2020 #10
Exactly! Caliman73 Feb 2020 #14
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Here's to future court vi...»Reply #17