Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(13,746 posts)

10. I wouldn't hold Boston up as an example.

Mon Feb 24, 2020, 08:03 PM

Feb 2020

I think it had corruption, poor design and engineering problems which lead to huge cost over runs and time delays.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

12 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Fix for a Hated N.Y.C. Highway: How About an $11 Billion Tunnel? [View all] Dennis Donovan Feb 2020 OP

Ban cars. Problem solved. :D Hermit-The-Prog Feb 2020 #1

Bigger problems created. Nt hack89 Feb 2020 #2

Higher shoe sales, lower health care costs. Hermit-The-Prog Feb 2020 #3

Until the public transportation infrastructure is in place hack89 Feb 2020 #7

When my niece lived in Washington DC, she gave up having a car csziggy Feb 2020 #6

As the digital economy brings even more people to the cities hack89 Feb 2020 #8

Well, with such simplistic solutions like that. NutmegYankee Feb 2020 #12

My vote is Yes - as a traveler passing through Prue Feb 2020 #4

Yeah, Seattle isn't quite to the "urban paradise" stage. maxsolomon Feb 2020 #9

I wouldn't hold Boston up as an example. Hotler Feb 2020 #10

But in the end edhopper Feb 2020 #11