General Discussion

BeFree

(23,843 posts)

35. No Not accurate

Fri Jan 6, 2012, 04:47 PM

Jan 2012

Clinton reduced the DoD budget to under 300M.

Wherever you are getting your false numbers needs to be questioned more so than say, Greenwald, because they are full of shit.

try to answer a simple question, PS, do you support the continued expansion of Empire, or not. You certainly seem to be in total support.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

83 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

FDL: Obama’s Pentagon Strategy: A Leaner, More Efficient Empire [View all] Luminous Animal Jan 2012 OP

Does everything get a bad spin? SunsetDreams Jan 2012 #1

At FireDogLake, it does. TheWraith Jan 2012 #3

Lunatic is being so overused, I now read it as "someone I disagree with but I Luminous Animal Jan 2012 #5

And of course the irony of using a GOP talking point like "lunatic Green Party Member" villager Jan 2012 #14

I have personally never heard a Republican or GOP operative ever mention the Green Party emulatorloo Jan 2012 #37

Gosh, well if *you personally* have never heard it, that negates all the times I've been called such villager Jan 2012 #83

Lunatic Green Party members like Medea Benjamin who was often the only dissenting voice EFerrari Jan 2012 #53

Edited to add the link... Luminous Animal Jan 2012 #4

here's the link Enrique Jan 2012 #7

There's downsizing and then there's "downsizing" JackRiddler Jan 2012 #25

+1 Luminous Animal Jan 2012 #38

Obama could announce a cure for cancer and FDL would assume he is promoting a drug for big pharma. DCBob Jan 2012 #74

Classic FDL: Find something to bash Obama about no matter the subject. TheWraith Jan 2012 #2

Good on FDL BeFree Jan 2012 #8

Yes, a black lining to be found in every silver cloud frazzled Jan 2012 #9

Right, ProSense Jan 2012 #6

He is reducing the growth of the defense budget primarily with personnel Luminous Animal Jan 2012 #10

And ProSense Jan 2012 #11

Shifting the killing from "boots on the ground" to drone bombing Luminous Animal Jan 2012 #13

And ProSense Jan 2012 #17

The same that the author's are referring to is this... Luminous Animal Jan 2012 #19

Well, ProSense Jan 2012 #22

I don't know the context of the nuclear arsenal cuts in question. Nevernose Jan 2012 #63

Well, good BeFree Jan 2012 #12

But ProSense Jan 2012 #15

He is calling for a decrease in growth. Luminous Animal Jan 2012 #16

Yeah, ProSense Jan 2012 #18

It won't happen BeFree Jan 2012 #21

Seriously ProSense Jan 2012 #23

You get it!! BeFree Jan 2012 #24

Hmmm? ProSense Jan 2012 #28

Nice spin BeFree Jan 2012 #30

It's amazing - it's so normal that being just under $700 billion JackRiddler Jan 2012 #33

Unfortunately Republicans don't feel safe unless we spend copious amounts of money that think Jan 2012 #78

The problem here is bipartisan. JackRiddler Jan 2012 #79

No disagreement there. Bush nearly doubled the war budget and Dems should not feel obligated think Jan 2012 #82

Can ProSense Jan 2012 #34

No Not accurate BeFree Jan 2012 #35

Maybe ProSense Jan 2012 #36

But Clinton wasn't fighting 2 MAJOR WARS either. FarLeftFist Jan 2012 #77

Cuts in future growth projections are not cuts. JackRiddler Jan 2012 #26

What? ProSense Jan 2012 #29

So to quote you, which is it, "cut spending" or "slow growth"?! JackRiddler Jan 2012 #31

Here: ProSense Jan 2012 #46

I'm sorry, that doesn't answer the question. Perhaps I should be more specific. JackRiddler Jan 2012 #58

Well ProSense Jan 2012 #66

ah, I see FDL links are making a comeback Whisp Jan 2012 #20

No substantive dealing with the critiques. JackRiddler Jan 2012 #27

An analogy: I have read several Glenn Beck rants. They are full of fact twisting, half-truths, emulatorloo Jan 2012 #39

Military spending will remain at or above current levels. JackRiddler Jan 2012 #41

Excellent post. nt woo me with science Jan 2012 #50

They never went away. JackRiddler Jan 2012 #32

Lying low is what they want. You have to stand your ground. joshcryer Jan 2012 #48

It's not about Obama, every US President is in the business of maintaing the US Empire. Puregonzo1188 Jan 2012 #40

Yes, of course. JackRiddler Jan 2012 #42

Funny, when Bush was President there all these posts about how many US bases around the world, list Puregonzo1188 Jan 2012 #55

FDL = LOL jpak Jan 2012 #43

a content free post paulk Jan 2012 #44

Wow ProSense Jan 2012 #45

and you have nothing to say paulk Jan 2012 #52

Well, ProSense Jan 2012 #57

You are correct, of course. nt woo me with science Jan 2012 #49

"Attack them on their strengths" - rove would be proud bhikkhu Jan 2012 #47

why would you assume it's "our side"? paulk Jan 2012 #54

55-60% of Democrats in the House vote against the MIC, consistently. joshcryer Jan 2012 #61

If I laid out a dream-list of demands and expectations in 2008 bhikkhu Jan 2012 #70

sometimes it seems to me that the "real world" paulk Jan 2012 #72

Its the direction that's important bhikkhu Jan 2012 #73

I take small comfort in this change of strategy paulk Jan 2012 #81

The Iraq War ended BECAUSE THE IRAQIS THREW US OUT! Puregonzo1188 Jan 2012 #56

That assumes that McCain would've listened to them, which he would not have. joshcryer Jan 2012 #59

Obama tried really hard to keep US troops in longer, but couldn't get immunity. Puregonzo1188 Jan 2012 #60

I disagree. He proposed it, it went through the discussions, it was denied. joshcryer Jan 2012 #65

He didn't try hard at all - that's pretty obvious in retrospect bhikkhu Jan 2012 #68

This ProSense Jan 2012 #69

Speaking of McCain ProSense Jan 2012 #67

If those meddling kids at wikileaks hadn't shown that damn video we'd still be spreading democracy think Jan 2012 #76

It's sort of surprising that this piece doesn't talk about Obama's fondness for JSOC EFerrari Jan 2012 #51

FDL = Faux Democrat League MjolnirTime Jan 2012 #62

To a leaner more efficient empire! Doesn't look much different, except it costs more. K&R (nt) T S Justly Jan 2012 #64

I think if FDL wants to retain credibility they need to support Jill Stein. joshcryer Jan 2012 #71

This is a major shift in policy from previous administrations. DCBob Jan 2012 #75

Trans: We're still going to give loads of money to the MIC but say we're not. Tierra_y_Libertad Jan 2012 #80