Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: OH LORDY THERE'S A TAPE [View all]mr_lebowski
(33,643 posts)49. lol your post is the exact sort of nitpicking i do compulsively ...
Last edited Thu Mar 5, 2020, 01:50 PM - Edit history (1)
You're right, he did not TECHNICALLY suggest that people go to work when ill with coronavirus.
But in the context, the implication was, at minimum, that going to work is not detrimental to getting better, would you agree with that?
And if so, isn't that tantamount to 'suggesting there's (at least possibly) no harm to the sick person if they were to go to work'?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
66 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
MAGATs don't even need to forget. If he tells him that he didn't say it, they just believe it.
iluvtennis
Mar 2020
#45
He conveniently skips over the fact that the folks "sitting aruond" are often not getting paid
flibbitygiblets
Mar 2020
#9
You are nobel to try and defend, but the president should not be the guy suggesting that
johnthewoodworker
Mar 2020
#41
Since it appears likely that we will have Joe "Super Thursday" Biden as our candidate -
Ms. Toad
Mar 2020
#64
The major problem with his "go to work sick" suggestion (it was at least that)
skip fox
Mar 2020
#18