Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

OmahaBlueDog

(10,000 posts)
20. It's certainly not Eisenhower's GOP
Sun Sep 9, 2012, 12:25 PM
Sep 2012
For the social stuff, I don't understand why it's anyone's business


It's a crazy disconnect. They are a party that favors small government and less regulation of businesses, but favors an exponential increase in interference in the personal lives of citizens.

I can see temporary deficits in recessions, but this crazy spending driving us to insolvency is unfathomable.


Personally, I agree with that philosophy. Deficits should be the exception, not the norm.

This country is out of control and it's both parties. If only there were a fiscal sanity party. I am beginning to come to the conclusion that our political system is wholly unsuited for our needs.


Congresscritters on both sides get re-elected "bringing home the bacon" for their district; Senators do likewise for their states. So government contractors (especially in defense) have gotten smart: spread the work out over many key states, and get the legislators beholden.

But here's the future I'd see with Mitt Romney: war in Iran (expensive); higher defense spending (expensive); and attempting to pay for this by making the bottom 90% of taxpayers pay for it.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

probably vote for Obama now WooWooWoo Sep 2012 #1
Or you don't vote OmahaBlueDog Sep 2012 #2
Easy. Democrats win on *both* counts. MannyGoldstein Sep 2012 #3
Reagan promised to lower taxes, balance the budget, and raise defense spending. OmahaBlueDog Sep 2012 #7
Republicans are the Borrow-and-Spend party. nt Bernardo de La Paz Sep 2012 #9
The ones I know like this call themselves blue dogs... cynatnite Sep 2012 #4
The people I know like this mostly consider themselves Republicans OmahaBlueDog Sep 2012 #6
THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS A FISCAL CONSERVATIVE Skittles Sep 2012 #5
There is. His name is Barack Obama or Bill Clinton (spending chart): Bernardo de La Paz Sep 2012 #8
While I think federal spending should be significantly increased, that is an effective pampango Sep 2012 #14
what do you mean? WooWooWoo Sep 2012 #16
A whole lot of Americans are right where you are IMO. k2qb3 Sep 2012 #10
Just to be clear - I'm actually referring to acquaintences. I'm a Dem OmahaBlueDog Sep 2012 #19
Sounds like abumbyanyothername Sep 2012 #11
And I wrote that abumbyanyothername Sep 2012 #12
I dunno, economically are you a Republican? Spider Jerusalem Sep 2012 #13
OK Sparky taxes are lowest they have been since well almost everyone’s lifetime nopedontlikeitatall Sep 2012 #15
curious datasuspect Sep 2012 #17
When I hear Republicans complain about "regulation", it generally comes down to three entities OmahaBlueDog Sep 2012 #21
What I don't understand is why anyone doesn't support a budget that is at least semi-balanced. dkf Sep 2012 #18
It's certainly not Eisenhower's GOP OmahaBlueDog Sep 2012 #20
I'd go with the Dems or the Green Party. Zorra Sep 2012 #22
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»So let me ask you this --...»Reply #20