Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
24. Nope and I will tell you why...
Sun Sep 9, 2012, 01:48 PM
Sep 2012

ACCESS... media at all levels is afraid of pissing off the important people and losing access. This is what scares them the most. No access, no story, so they tell me.

So yes, the corporations, not just those who own the media, as well as politicians, run rough shot over media.

We had a perfect example of this in a local story last night. And what should have been a simple they had a fire at a facility and they have their own fire brigade, (that is what got us rolling, what do you mean the utility has their own fire brigade?) has become something else. That is because my editor is not worried about ruffling a few feathers when it comes to energy companies. Yup, a story I need to write today. And since it is not truly breaking nooz right now, but how a public utility plays the game...I will take a little more time with it, including more than my usual breaking nooz edits.

But the other channels who were there, partly due to the company lack of PR, will not touch the they tried to squash media and first amendment rights.

So if you think that this will change... not until media at all levels decide to stop playing that game and decide instead to actually ruffle feathers. It used to be that way... in the age of muckraking journalism. But most of it is gone, will come back, I guarantee it. Partly the net is making it easier for people to run nooz sites... but partly... pay attention here... pay in journalism is crashing. Muckrackers were working poor people who identified with the workers they covered. These days the news bunnies are paid fairly well, and have internalized the values of the corporations and the well to do. As pay continues to crash... that will change. And it will probably lead to a more agressive sort of journalsim. This scares them, the powerful that is, like crazy.

There is a solution to that problem... but they will not do it. Pay their people well above average... that coops the system. But if you pay your reporters and video graphers and the rest well, then it's easier for them to see the people on welfare like useless leeches. You don't... well there is this thing called class solidarity and resentment that starts to emerge after some time.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

CNN sure hasn't changed /nt still_one Sep 2012 #1
I can hear Wolf saying "Let's leave it there" Odd Won Out Sep 2012 #4
IMO O'Donnell was exploiting a job opportunity this AM--Bob Schieffer was ProgressiveEconomist Sep 2012 #23
If that was O'Donnell's motivation, Odd Won Out Sep 2012 #25
Yes they have. Atman Sep 2012 #13
She was doing that more than the others before Newsroom /nt still_one Sep 2012 #18
I'll have to check out her show Odd Won Out Sep 2012 #21
Can't say. ananda Sep 2012 #2
The series a little hit and miss Odd Won Out Sep 2012 #6
It's apparently affected a couple of individuals. The network owners, not so much. Scuba Sep 2012 #3
No, a TV show will not affect the agenda of the corporate media tabasco Sep 2012 #5
You are probably right Odd Won Out Sep 2012 #8
I think it may have influenced Soledad O'Brien Bjorn Against Sep 2012 #7
Good list of tools. I totally agree with your assessment. Odd Won Out Sep 2012 #10
Tweety's son is an actor on the show... Boxerfan Sep 2012 #9
I didn't know that about Tweety's son Esse Quam Videri Sep 2012 #11
Bit part--walk-on... Surya Gayatri Sep 2012 #34
I thought that Tweety would be the perfect "Greater Fool" Odd Won Out Sep 2012 #12
imdb says Thomas Matthews was in all 10 episodes as 'Martin Stallworth' ProgressiveEconomist Sep 2012 #27
He played "Romney" in the Debate episode RockaFowler Sep 2012 #33
Matthews, Soledad, and surprisingly Juan Williams seem to have a Newsroom bug. grantcart Sep 2012 #14
Really? I have been reluctant to connect the dots. That's why I asked the question. Odd Won Out Sep 2012 #15
I watched as Juan Williams called out the Romney campaign for playing the race card. grantcart Sep 2012 #16
Wow. Juan Williams would be that last person that I would think about doing the right thing Odd Won Out Sep 2012 #19
This was the other incident the following day. No one else seemed to have seen the Rove exchange. grantcart Sep 2012 #31
Did you know that one of the Newsroom characters... CoffeeCat Sep 2012 #17
Didn't know about Christine Romans. Odd Won Out Sep 2012 #20
Is that the Sloan character? She's my favorite. tridim Sep 2012 #28
I think it's the Maggie character... CoffeeCat Sep 2012 #29
Just looked it up.. It's Sloan, the economics reporter. tridim Sep 2012 #42
At least one rumor has it that Will McAvoy is Keith Olbermann, ProgressiveEconomist Sep 2012 #30
It lit a fire under Tweety, that's for sure. Iggo Sep 2012 #22
Nope and I will tell you why... nadinbrzezinski Sep 2012 #24
Thanks so much for your thoughtful response, but Odd Won Out Sep 2012 #32
I am just giving you the response from the actual trenches nadinbrzezinski Sep 2012 #36
I don't know how much it has been influencing the media... Blue Belle Sep 2012 #26
I am surprised at the amount of negative reviews about Newsroom Odd Won Out Sep 2012 #41
I think it's helped Matthews :) he thinks Will McAvoy character is based on himself sasha031 Sep 2012 #35
If a mediocre TeeVee series can actually influence real life journalism, Ship of Fools Sep 2012 #37
Mediocre Sorkin Is Still Better Than 95% Of Other Programming. Paladin Sep 2012 #39
With Jon Stewart and Stephen Colbert satirizing the news media every day, Odd Won Out Sep 2012 #40
"Journalists" Think The Problem Is The Other Guy... KharmaTrain Sep 2012 #38
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Has the HBO series "...»Reply #24