Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

In reply to the discussion: Response to FB Post [View all]

RKP5637

(67,112 posts)
28. Exactly and well said! And Romney wants to add 2.1 Trillion more to the
Sun Sep 9, 2012, 04:40 PM
Sep 2012

defense department/contractors. It really makes one wonder if Romney plans on creating WWIII for the profit of his defense contractor buddies. I really see no way in hell that this defense department spending bubble for the MIC is going to spiral downward. Too many are making too many $$$'s off of defense spending. Eisenhower was sooo correct.

http://thinkprogress.org/security/2012/05/10/481764/romney-military-spending-2-trillion/?mobile=nc

Mitt Romney is campaigning for president on fiscal responsibility. “The mission to restore America begins with getting our fiscal house in order,” he says. At the same time, the presumptive GOP nominee says he wants to increase military spending. His campaign website claims that a President Romney will peg the Pentagon’s budget to Gross Domestic Product “at a floor of 4 percent of GDP.” What will that mean in dollars? CNNMoney reports that under Romney’s plan, “the additional spending really piles up in future years”:

With the Pentagon’s base budget — which does not include war costs — forecast to hit 3.5% of GDP in 2013, a jump to 4% would mean an increase of around $100 billion dollars in defense spending in 2013.

Compared to the Pentagon’s current budget, Romney’s plan would lead to $2.1 trillion in additional spending over the next ten years, according to an analysis conducted for CNNMoney by Travis Sharp, a budget expert at the Center for a New American Security.

And that number assumes a gradual increase to 4% of GDP. The additional spending would hit $2.3 trillion over a decade if the Pentagon’s budget were to immediately jump to 4% of GDP.[...]

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Response to FB Post [View all] citizen blues Sep 2012 OP
Corporatism has also brought us unchecked pollution. Scuba Sep 2012 #1
And a permanent state of war. zeemike Sep 2012 #23
Of course. I'm remiss by not mentioning it. Thank you. Scuba Sep 2012 #27
Exactly and well said! And Romney wants to add 2.1 Trillion more to the RKP5637 Sep 2012 #28
bravo TeamPooka Sep 2012 #2
Hmmm. PowerToThePeople Sep 2012 #3
Excellent Response WiffenPoof Sep 2012 #4
K&R. Well said. Overseas Sep 2012 #5
bookmark to return to - excellent response. rurallib Sep 2012 #6
kr nt docgee Sep 2012 #7
That was a great response. Ruby the Liberal Sep 2012 #8
We are CLOSE to Fascism, but not quite there. Spitfire of ATJ Sep 2012 #9
They should update this clip... Blue Belle Sep 2012 #11
People forget how bad things were under Bush. Spitfire of ATJ Sep 2012 #14
next! heaven05 Sep 2012 #16
nope heaven05 Sep 2012 #17
I'm saving this response... Blue Belle Sep 2012 #10
Cons just say they are against corporatism booley Sep 2012 #12
They think the words are interchangeable lunatica Sep 2012 #13
citizen, that's about the best quick definition I've ever seen!!! BlancheSplanchnik Sep 2012 #15
Democratic process gave us those benefits. WtP CHOSE to be socially responsible. Tigress DEM Sep 2012 #18
What IS Interdependence? Tigress DEM Sep 2012 #19
They did a study a while back and 72% of students believed in WWII,... Spitfire of ATJ Sep 2012 #20
I'd say Socialism is the parent of communism because all communists are socialist but not all social craigmatic Sep 2012 #21
Pure Communism is where the state owns all means of production. ErikJ Sep 2012 #22
What part of a government OF BY AND FOR its people.... chknltl Sep 2012 #24
Good logic. You might be a socialist if: ErikJ Sep 2012 #25
I like that! - n/t mazzarro Sep 2012 #29
Thanks for that and the link! freshwest Sep 2012 #31
Guilty as charged! I am indeed a socislist by those examples. chknltl Sep 2012 #32
K&R nt avebury Sep 2012 #26
Excellent. Will look again to see what the answers were. freshwest Sep 2012 #30
And I'll bet you heard crickets in reply. intheflow Sep 2012 #33
Correction: Fantastic Anarchist Sep 2012 #34
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Response to FB Post»Reply #28