General Discussion

dimbear

(6,271 posts)

21. Thanks for a thoughtful reply. When I think of important powerful women who

Fri Jan 6, 2012, 07:50 PM

Jan 2012

got there through thinking and hard work I think Democrats. Hillary Clinton, Nancy Pelosi, our California Senators, Oprah Winfrey, and so on.

I don't recognise those you mentioned. Who are they again?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

62 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Sexual Economics: Sex as Female Resource for Social Exchange in Heterosexual Interactions [View all] LoZoccolo Jan 2012 OP

Not this again. Saving Hawaii Jan 2012 #1

Why not this again? Zalatix Jan 2012 #8

It's a load of crap. chrisa Jan 2012 #14

It is an econ paper you know. Saving Hawaii Jan 2012 #15

Haha. Yeah, true. chrisa Jan 2012 #20

> Survivoreesta Jan 2012 #61

This sounds like theory divorced ProgressiveEconomist Jan 2012 #22

True, but the theory is not entirely divorced from reality. Consider this: Zalatix Jan 2012 #27

My first thought as well. chrisa Jan 2012 #13

In. Fire Walk With Me Jan 2012 #2

100% of sperm in favor of sex Angry Dragon Jan 2012 #3

I think we should ask Beyonc�. Warren DeMontague Jan 2012 #4

Since this is Democratic Underground, let me reassert that the Democratic Party is the party dimbear Jan 2012 #5

May I offer a correction? Zalatix Jan 2012 #9

Thanks for a thoughtful reply. When I think of important powerful women who dimbear Jan 2012 #21

I came here because it was the party of the working man. lumberjack_jeff Jan 2012 #29

No, not a bit. It's a big party, but this thread is about needling women. I'll defend dimbear Jan 2012 #41

Exhibit A Electric Monk Jan 2012 #6

Well, duh! Laelth Jan 2012 #7

Spamming this idiocy again? redqueen Jan 2012 #10

If straight people are capitalists, gay men must be like sex socialists. originalpckelly Jan 2012 #11

That, and the fact that here no one can unrec it. JHB Jan 2012 #12

You are talking to Loco MattBaggins Jan 2012 #35

That's OK, I'm not really talking to him... JHB Jan 2012 #50

thanks for info, jhb. appreciate it. nt seabeyond Jan 2012 #60

What a load of horseshit. Odin2005 Jan 2012 #16

84% of liberals think this is a terrible idea. dawg Jan 2012 #17

Sanctity! You straights are just so Sanctified! Bluenorthwest Jan 2012 #18

not exciting enough in here today? trying to start something? CreekDog Jan 2012 #19

There are some things wrong in there treestar Jan 2012 #23

Sex-starved male grad students pulling BS out of their asses. Odin2005 Jan 2012 #26

Interesting slutticus Jan 2012 #24

I forget what it's called, but there's a line of thought that tries to link chrisa Jan 2012 #37

I think you're referring to "evolutionary psychology". LoZoccolo Jan 2012 #40

Thanks! Yeah, it's total bullshit. chrisa Jan 2012 #49

get some new material! are you bored or something? dooga dooga dooga. dionysus Jan 2012 #25

Good article. ananda Jan 2012 #28

This phenomenon is the primary reason for cynicism among men. n/t lumberjack_jeff Jan 2012 #30

i guess you can address all the men willing to pay to use another human being. instead of shifting seabeyond Jan 2012 #31

Women who marry for money are also paying to use another human being. lumberjack_jeff Jan 2012 #33

that is so fuckin disgusting. nt seabeyond Jan 2012 #38

I'd like to figure out more about how you are thinking about this. LoZoccolo Jan 2012 #42

Why do you assume that most women marry the man with the most money? Nikia Jan 2012 #43

since hands down majority of women are living with men who are not making much and are working too seabeyond Jan 2012 #48

I didn't. Full stop. n/t lumberjack_jeff Jan 2012 #57

No, they are selling themselves to the men who are paying to use them. redqueen Jan 2012 #51

One "sells" assets. lumberjack_jeff Jan 2012 #59

Hey, what happened to my (very short) ignore list? Quantess Jan 2012 #32

It was crap on DU2 MattBaggins Jan 2012 #34

How do you know? Eliminator Jan 2012 #36

have you done one post yet... just one, where you do not reduce a woman to a whore? nt seabeyond Jan 2012 #39

The article in the OP actually does that too. chrisa Jan 2012 #45

yes. i know. all women are whores. i have been told that often on du the seabeyond Jan 2012 #47

It says a lot about you... Eliminator Jan 2012 #53

not one. i didnt think so. i gotcha. nt seabeyond Jan 2012 #55

Please spare me the "bad father" MattBaggins Jan 2012 #44

Not saying you're a bad father Eliminator Jan 2012 #54

This is kind of obvious from a biological perspective. Pacafishmate Jan 2012 #46

I'm not going to read this. But I do have something to say. Remember Me Jan 2012 #52

encapsulates the entire female experience under Patriarchy seabeyond Jan 2012 #56

Very well said, thank you. Withywindle Jan 2012 #58

They're not under the impression that they're the first to actually discover this Hippo_Tron Jan 2012 #62