Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(7,117 posts)

13. I take a different view.

Mon Sep 10, 2012, 01:24 PM

Sep 2012

He's a phony now, and he was a phony then; the only difference is we didn't know the real John Edwards yet back in 2004.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

18 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

I never thought I would ever say this but there are worse choices for VP than Palin [View all] LynneSin Sep 2012 OP

It makes you wonder how much further avebury Sep 2012 #1

Sarah Palin was scary for being stupid. Paul Ryan is scary Jennicut Sep 2012 #2

Way back in 1988, when they dredged up Dan Quayle Chorophyll Sep 2012 #3

worse for who? For the ticket or for the country if elected? corkhead Sep 2012 #4

She was a 'game changer' for about 10 minutes... LynneSin Sep 2012 #5

Ryans worse..... Flashmann Sep 2012 #6

I don't know which one would be worse! Quantess Sep 2012 #7

Ask yourself this - which do you think is worse? A Dumbass or a Liar LynneSin Sep 2012 #8

Never Underestimate The Party Of Hate... KharmaTrain Sep 2012 #9

Edwards was never a bad choice for VP LynneSin Sep 2012 #11

I take a different view. JaneQPublic Sep 2012 #13

Exactly LynneSin Sep 2012 #17

They are both just as bad rox63 Sep 2012 #12

since quayle WAS VP, i'd say we already had the worst. pansypoo53219 Sep 2012 #14

Both are grifters, toxic, and vain. lunatica Sep 2012 #15

I think VP is term-limited and in this case thank goodness LynneSin Sep 2012 #18