General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: NYT BOMBSHELL: Significantly MORE 9/11 NEGLIGENCE Than Has Been Disclosed [View all]William Seger
(10,778 posts)... but now, there's really no doubt that he's just a huckster and a fraud. By now, after losing debate after debate, Gage knows exactly what's wrong with his "explosive evidence" but doesn't care, as long as gullible people will continue contributing to his AE911truth scam. The truth is, not one of these "1,500 architectural and engineering professionals" has come up with a single technical argument or shred of evidence that holds water with genuine experts, and believing this "controlled demolition" nonsense requires completely ignoring the actual evidence. The truth is, scientific controversy is not settled by YouTube videos and blogs, even if they weren't filled with half-truths, distortions, and serious omissions. The proof that Gage is a complete fraud is that there is no real scientific controversy about the question of controlled demolitions on 9/11.