Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

rfranklin

(13,200 posts)
15. The NYT article today said that they had at least 80 separate warnings and did nothing....
Tue Sep 11, 2012, 01:01 PM
Sep 2012

Last edited Tue Sep 11, 2012, 01:54 PM - Edit history (1)

And the C.I.A. repeated the warnings in the briefs that followed. Operatives connected to Bin Laden, one reported on June 29, expected the planned near-term attacks to have “dramatic consequences,” including major casualties. On July 1, the brief stated that the operation had been delayed, but “will occur soon.” Some of the briefs again reminded Mr. Bush that the attack timing was flexible, and that, despite any perceived delay, the planned assault was on track.

Yet, the White House failed to take significant action. Officials at the Counterterrorism Center of the C.I.A. grew apoplectic. On July 9, at a meeting of the counterterrorism group, one official suggested that the staff put in for a transfer so that somebody else would be responsible when the attack took place, two people who were there told me in interviews. The suggestion was batted down, they said, because there would be no time to train anyone else.
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/11/opinion/the-bush-white-house-was-deaf-to-9-11-warnings.html

On edit: I actaully heard the author on WNYC say that they had 80 different warnings. I don't think it was in the article.

kick Angry Dragon Sep 2012 #1
why, yes, barbtries Sep 2012 #2
I still put the primary blame on the degenerate individuals who flew those planes slackmaster Sep 2012 #3
.......... Angry Dragon Sep 2012 #23
Sorta like us an our 'bunker busters' annihilating entire cities of innocents overseas, yes? Myrina Sep 2012 #40
That was more than 60 years ago, so it doesn't count. Please try to stay focused. slackmaster Sep 2012 #46
yeah heaven05 Sep 2012 #50
Supporting the terrorists, blaming the innocent victims slackmaster Sep 2012 #53
oh please heaven05 Sep 2012 #56
This message was self-deleted by its author HangOnKids Sep 2012 #90
They also had inside help: Max Keiser: Katashi_itto Sep 2012 #97
Reminds me of this: PavePusher Sep 2012 #149
The first Gulf War was more than 60 years ago. Blanks Sep 2012 #77
What is the precise and relevant cut-off date? On what objective measure is that date based? LanternWaste Sep 2012 #80
It doesn't matter slackmaster Sep 2012 #95
It may have been morally wrong, but there was plenty of justification. RC Sep 2012 #104
I can't believe this shit is being posted on DU slackmaster Sep 2012 #111
How can we deal with the problems, if we deny there is any? RC Sep 2012 #139
Oh, please. You're absolving US foreign policy when it most certainly contributed to the hatred of tpsbmam Sep 2012 #163
I'm agreeing with you. RC Sep 2012 #165
Tell us..... pocoloco Sep 2012 #141
You can't possibly be serious, so I'll just leave it at that slackmaster Sep 2012 #162
Or the slaughter of over one million innocent Iraqis who had nothing to do with 9/11. sabrina 1 Sep 2012 #101
Yeah, that's the kind of thing that happens when you kick a hornet's nest slackmaster Sep 2012 #112
Lol, you forgot your sarcasm tag I think. sabrina 1 Sep 2012 #117
This has gone completely down the rabbit hole into tinfoil hat conspiracy land slackmaster Sep 2012 #119
Yeah, it's a good thing we stopped using those 60 years ago. progressoid Sep 2012 #124
I agree treestar Sep 2012 #45
I can't either. I felt the same way when I watched Bush's WMDs falling on sabrina 1 Sep 2012 #154
Even if we don't support the war in Iraq, at least it was a war treestar Sep 2012 #160
It was not a war, it was a brutal, barbaric invasion and that is how history will record it. sabrina 1 Sep 2012 #164
I agree with you, to hell with them, but you don't think that any part of the US foreign truebrit71 Sep 2012 #59
I think it really started with the way the UK partitioned what we now call Iraq in 1920 slackmaster Sep 2012 #94
"Justify?" No. Scootaloo Sep 2012 #78
"Primary blame?" truebluegreen Sep 2012 #86
Most blame, first cause, final cause slackmaster Sep 2012 #93
You're kidding correct? RC Sep 2012 #106
Fuck the fucking fuckity fuck NO I'm not kidding. slackmaster Sep 2012 #113
Post removed Post removed Sep 2012 #88
You're citing rense.com as a source? slackmaster Sep 2012 #96
There are several links, that was at the top AnotherDreamWeaver Sep 2012 #140
VeteransToday is an absolutely horrible forum LeftishBrit Sep 2012 #150
Do you want to believe Mnpaul Sep 2012 #157
yeah, salting their land with a WMD chknltl Sep 2012 #110
When did the US attack SAUDI FUCKING ARABIA with DU? slackmaster Sep 2012 #114
Please show me where i said anyone attacked Saudi Arabia with anything. chknltl Sep 2012 #116
The 9/11 attackers were Saudis. What did you mean by "salting their land with a WMD?" slackmaster Sep 2012 #118
Evasive at best nonanswer. chknltl Sep 2012 #138
Ask the Kurds! sabrina 1 Sep 2012 #145
This message was self-deleted by its author Q Sep 2012 #130
Well yes, they did the actual killing but you would have to say Rex Sep 2012 #146
I will always remember who was the President of the United States and how he did not keep us safe. jillan Sep 2012 #4
The NYT article today said that they had at least 80 separate warnings and did nothing.... rfranklin Sep 2012 #15
Also, the Genoa conference that Bush attended. KansDem Sep 2012 #44
Too little too late dogday Sep 2012 #63
And you had to include that photo without a warning jsmirman Sep 2012 #5
so you are avoiding all visual media today? Scout Sep 2012 #18
I sure as heck am not turning on my tv jsmirman Sep 2012 #21
Do you wear a blindfold once a year? aquart Sep 2012 #28
"Antiseptic" to you jsmirman Sep 2012 #31
A photo of... Sophiegirl Sep 2012 #71
Excellent. K&R nt TBF Sep 2012 #6
The words on your post, they should be remembered Autumn Sep 2012 #7
The shrub administration let it happen. They needed it to invade Iraq. HopeHoops Sep 2012 #8
Yup--Dubya's Trifecta. classof56 Sep 2012 #9
"Mission Accomplished" HopeHoops Sep 2012 #14
Thats speculation Hope. Not saying its impossible though because sure it could be that is cstanleytech Sep 2012 #17
Well, perhaps. But they needed a catalyst, planned on it all along, and knew it was coming. HopeHoops Sep 2012 #30
anything heaven05 Sep 2012 #57
Again thats all speculation though. cstanleytech Sep 2012 #65
Can't argue with the "assholes" part. And yes, it can only be speculation. HopeHoops Sep 2012 #70
Nope, the real thing that aided Bush in getting approval for the invasion cstanleytech Sep 2012 #75
Ignoring Romney's Iraq falsehood, Wash. Post called .... polly7 Sep 2012 #79
Polly I am talking about all the stonewalling he (Saddam) did not what their reports were. cstanleytech Sep 2012 #81
My point was .. polly7 Sep 2012 #84
Again it wasnt so much that they were allowed in as it was that Saddam made cstanleytech Sep 2012 #109
oh please heaven05 Sep 2012 #125
You said it nicer than I was thinking it. nt. polly7 Sep 2012 #129
Also from your article Mnpaul Sep 2012 #156
Saddam was naive. Chemisse Sep 2012 #123
Agree, I think he believed that Bush was bluffing and would backoff or atleast that he wouldnt be cstanleytech Sep 2012 #134
Thank you for this post azurnoir Sep 2012 #10
Clipped from the paper a week after 9/11 Spitfire of ATJ Sep 2012 #11
The easily offended jsmirman Sep 2012 #12
It amazes me how callous people are here today. HappyMe Sep 2012 #13
So it's callous Piazza Riforma Sep 2012 #35
yep heaven05 Sep 2012 #54
Damn, wished I could rec this post dogday Sep 2012 #64
I totally agree Carolina Sep 2012 #73
very good summation! ccinamon Sep 2012 #85
+10,000 or more! RC Sep 2012 #122
Excellent post - welcome to DU! TBF Sep 2012 #167
What are you referring to? I thought the OP was rather appropriate. HopeHoops Sep 2012 #16
That same point could easily have been made jsmirman Sep 2012 #19
You could've just asked him to remove the photo or include a warning. Iggo Sep 2012 #25
there was a warning Carolina Sep 2012 #74
Okay. I can see that point. I hadn't considered it from that perspective. HopeHoops Sep 2012 #32
Thank you jsmirman Sep 2012 #39
That's the best we can do - keep an open mind. HopeHoops Sep 2012 #42
Hear,hear. Stryder Sep 2012 #91
The picture behind the words is the point. RC Sep 2012 #128
It's the picture. For some it requires a warning. DevonRex Sep 2012 #20
Thank you jsmirman Sep 2012 #24
I wish I could wrap my arms around you. DevonRex Sep 2012 #27
Thank you jsmirman Sep 2012 #34
I was watching when the second plane hit. My first thought was... HopeHoops Sep 2012 #36
"Intercept"... and do what? n/t PavePusher Sep 2012 #47
Try and get it off course, bring it down in a less-populated area....Something.... truebrit71 Sep 2012 #61
Your ideas intrigue me and I would like to subscribe to your newsletter.... PavePusher Sep 2012 #148
SOP is to shoot it down if it doesn't respond to redirection instructions. HopeHoops Sep 2012 #69
Another thing I hate about this day's usual grief porn Pab Sungenis Sep 2012 #37
Where in fuck's name do I suggest I'm the only person that lost someone jsmirman Sep 2012 #41
Really? Pab Sungenis Sep 2012 #48
Wrong again. jsmirman Sep 2012 #52
You inferred that, he didn't imply it. LanternWaste Sep 2012 #82
Great OP. Alduin Sep 2012 #22
I have little but contempt for people who can't entertain cali Sep 2012 #26
could you retype the text but take the picture out? Whisp Sep 2012 #29
Thank you jsmirman Sep 2012 #33
Why? Webster Green Sep 2012 #38
why? just simply because some are asking. Whisp Sep 2012 #49
The images are everywhere today. Webster Green Sep 2012 #76
Remove it because some are asking to have it removed? RC Sep 2012 #133
Maybe it would be a big deal. Did you consider that? closeupready Sep 2012 #87
are you way off the mark or what. Whisp Sep 2012 #89
This message was self-deleted by its author closeupready Sep 2012 #107
Remember what George Bush actually said at his 1st presser after the attackes were over. Old and In the Way Sep 2012 #43
actually, George*, SUPPOSEDLY no one - except those on the ground - saw the first plane hit. Raster Sep 2012 #142
George saw the video of the first plane hitting on 9/11 Mnpaul Sep 2012 #158
For those offended by the use of a pic that is universally recognized relogic Sep 2012 #51
Great post! Jamastiene Sep 2012 #55
yep heaven05 Sep 2012 #60
Excellent post malaise Sep 2012 #62
Super Post dogday Sep 2012 #66
Accurate get the red out Sep 2012 #58
I don't necessarily agree with the points, but K&R closeupready Sep 2012 #67
And it's funny how offense/rioting over cartoons is poopoo'ed here but closeupready Sep 2012 #68
Oh I suspect they would still hate us even if we had had a hands off approach to the entire cstanleytech Sep 2012 #72
oh please heaven05 Sep 2012 #126
Sorry but I dont believe they would be all hugs and kisses like some seem to be wanting to cstanleytech Sep 2012 #131
Who instituted our laws that put people to death? You speak as if we were so civilized sabrina 1 Sep 2012 #153
No, its not ok that our government has done some of the things its done cstanleytech Sep 2012 #155
American Foreign Policy = Chickens Come Home to Roost Tom Ripley Sep 2012 #83
exactly heaven05 Sep 2012 #127
K&R n/t proReality Sep 2012 #92
The Bush administration will go down in history as the worst ever!!! SmittynMo Sep 2012 #98
Guess you have to.. Sophiegirl Sep 2012 #99
Welcome to DU Sophiegirl. Autumn Sep 2012 #100
I've been here over 10 years and I'm ignored more than I am interacted with. Lots of people patrice Sep 2012 #102
NAILED it! Now, let's all politely prevent real time people from forgetting, please. nt patrice Sep 2012 #103
Here's the image that I always remember about 9/11/01 tularetom Sep 2012 #105
In Texas we call this posture, "Playing Possum". DhhD Sep 2012 #120
According to the NY times article today, 80 different dogday Sep 2012 #135
Bin Ladens 1996 Fatwa fingrinn Sep 2012 #108
K and R ClayZ Sep 2012 #115
Yeah but the people who flew the planes into the WTC were mostly Saudi's. npk Sep 2012 #121
Of course the blame... Q Sep 2012 #132
I agree the 9/11 commission was obstructed from the word go. npk Sep 2012 #136
Another 9/11 truth. RC Sep 2012 #137
dick cheney* knew more about 9/11 than did Saddam Hussein Raster Sep 2012 #144
15 of the 19 hijackers were Saudi nationals Raster Sep 2012 #143
The Saudis did not love us or the fact that the BFEE Rex Sep 2012 #147
all around the world innocent people die every day. tomp Sep 2012 #151
Everything's Going According To Plan. blkmusclmachine Sep 2012 #152
How can I not? LWolf Sep 2012 #159
Sounds like victim blaming 4th law of robotics Sep 2012 #161
About the same the hundred thousand Iraqi civilians did to those people in the towers. Hassin Bin Sober Sep 2012 #166
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»"Always remember?&qu...»Reply #15