Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

LAS14

(15,507 posts)
36. It's risky and reckless as a general bit of advice, but for individual...
Tue Mar 31, 2020, 06:25 PM
Mar 2020

... families, who understand that the exposed other members must self quarantine for 14 days the after the infected person is no longer infectious I still think it is a good idea. It's too complicated for general advice to the population.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Aren't you the one who said Chris Cuomo should infect his wife and kids? HarlanPepper Mar 2020 #1
One and the same. LisaL Mar 2020 #9
I don't think you realize Bev54 Mar 2020 #32
I have understood this but I hope for a Fall vaccine janterry Mar 2020 #2
On the other hand, see South Korea for a more sensible approach. Hermit-The-Prog Mar 2020 #3
It's too late for a South Korea approach in most parts of the country. LAS14 Mar 2020 #11
Who Doesn't Get This? jayfish Mar 2020 #4
I understand your point, but what you are saying isn't actually true. enki23 Mar 2020 #5
China is a prime example of that. LisaL Mar 2020 #8
They did more than flatten the curve. Igel Mar 2020 #24
Isn't that what we are hoping for? LisaL Mar 2020 #31
I sure hope this is true. LAS14 Mar 2020 #14
Three very basic epi models enki23 Mar 2020 #23
That hasn't been the case in China. LisaL Mar 2020 #6
In all of China or in the infected province? LAS14 Mar 2020 #12
Wuhan alone has 11 million people. LisaL Mar 2020 #30
The idea is to put off getting it for as long as possible, The Velveteen Ocelot Mar 2020 #7
Yeah, but that is relevant for the vulnerable population, but not... LAS14 Mar 2020 #13
All of the population is vulnerable. GulfCoast66 Mar 2020 #17
Vulnerable or not - Ms. Toad Mar 2020 #18
Sounds almost like me trying to get all the std's I could get in a number of provocative ways. tirebiter Mar 2020 #10
That may be true of a lot of people, but customerserviceguy Mar 2020 #15
Deliberately seeking to get it early is not hate-filled, but it is stupid. Ms. Toad Mar 2020 #16
My opinion on your Boomer-esque request for Cuomo EllieBC Mar 2020 #19
Not every "Boomer" is the one you have in your imagination. nt Progressive Jones Mar 2020 #25
No, but it is stupid. You have no way of knowing Phoenix61 Mar 2020 #20
I'll bet most of us understood it, but two days ago I heard an expert disagree Mike 03 Mar 2020 #21
****** NO !!!! ***** IF we start testing with no prerequisites, Isolate the infected, clean our ... uponit7771 Mar 2020 #22
If the hospitals are full then more will die. El Supremo Mar 2020 #26
Exactly. That's why you want the young, healthy people to become immune. We hope... LAS14 Mar 2020 #33
Nothing protects the young, healthy person from needing hospital resources. Ms. Toad Mar 2020 #38
I think DUers are smarter than you think Freethinker65 Mar 2020 #27
I'm mystified that DU continues to allow this dangerous nonsense greenjar_01 Mar 2020 #28
Almost like anti-vaccine stuff GulfCoast66 Mar 2020 #37
Here is where you are, potentially, DEAD wrong... blitzen Mar 2020 #29
I don't think you understand Sunsky Mar 2020 #34
It's risky and reckless as a general bit of advice, but for individual... LAS14 Mar 2020 #36
A lot depends on the time over which the infection spreads: struggle4progress Mar 2020 #35
No chance in hell for us, but considered it for about 2 mins. Brainfodder Mar 2020 #39
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I don't think DUers under...»Reply #36