Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

FBaggins

(28,619 posts)
6. It would imply "already tested"
Mon Apr 6, 2020, 07:45 AM
Apr 2020

It's just that the same figure can be expressed in two ways. But if you combine them it says something entirely different.

I had a student once come out of driver's training believing that he had to keep a following distance of two seconds per ten MPH that he was traveling. The old rule of thumb is actually "two seconds OR two car lengths per 10 MPH" - which both give (very roughly) the same following distance. But if you read it as "two seconds per 10 MPH" you would get a following distance of over 1,000 feet at 60 MPH.

If we say ".5% per million" and there are 327 million people in the US... .5 X 327 = 163.5. We obviously haven't tested over 150% of the country. While "5K/million" and ".5%" are the same number (about 1.6 million tests).

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»QUESTION: US is testing l...»Reply #6