Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Explain to me why I am wrong, please. [View all]Celerity
(53,443 posts)9. millions of people will get it and never even know they had it until they are antibody tested
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
41 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
the total cases in the US are MASSIVELY undercounted, so your death rate of 40%
Celerity
Apr 2020
#1
The "recovered" number will come from people infected earlier than the deaths
muriel_volestrangler
Apr 2020
#4
This, plus they probably only count 'recovered' that they can prove are recovered ...
mr_lebowski
Apr 2020
#6
millions of people will get it and never even know they had it until they are antibody tested
Celerity
Apr 2020
#9
True, but they are not members of the tested positive population the numbers are based on.
StTimofEdenRoc
Apr 2020
#10
if the lethality were 40%, you would potentially have tens of millions of deaths here in the EU,
Celerity
Apr 2020
#13
I fail to see what you are attempting to find out. I can but say one thing for certain.
Celerity
Apr 2020
#25
That was a DU glitch ... I used an improper character in teh title (less than sign)
mr_lebowski
Apr 2020
#20
because the vast majority of cases globally are not being tested at all, and when you take the
Celerity
Apr 2020
#23
Okay ... so, you're pulling a number out of thin air to enter into your calculations ...
mr_lebowski
Apr 2020
#29
no, you are wrong, I was showing the absurdity of a 40% lethality rate when viral spread was
Celerity
Apr 2020
#33
my last reply, because you are still missing the entire point, the huge numbers were based off a
Celerity
Apr 2020
#35
oki, I see what you are saying, I should have said potentially, not already, I give you that point
Celerity
Apr 2020
#37
I am also exhausted as well, I have been multitasking all day and night as it is downtime in the
Celerity
Apr 2020
#41
it was in the subject line, that is why I never noticed it, many misspeakings I have made on DU
Celerity
Apr 2020
#39
So there are more future recoveries then future deaths hiding in the time-lag. I hope you are right.
StTimofEdenRoc
Apr 2020
#12
If you look at the recovery numbers for other countries, or work them out for states
muriel_volestrangler
Apr 2020
#15
Exactly ... one country (or even state or county) might say you're 'recovered' if you're still alive
mr_lebowski
Apr 2020
#18
bottom line we have NO accurate data on who is infected and who has died from it anywhere in
beachbumbob
Apr 2020
#26
People who are not tested are not part of the OP's calculations whatsoever ...
mr_lebowski
Apr 2020
#32
The OP claimed "The mild condition population contributes to the recovered count."
FBaggins
Apr 2020
#38