NYT BOMBSHELL: Significantly MORE 9/11 NEGLIGENCE Than Has Been Disclosed

[jeff47]

283. So not 3600 as you previously claimed

And you seem to have missed the "depending on the alloy" part of my post.

I know fire chiefs in NYC who never ever saw steel melt or collapse as it did then.

Please list all the similar fires in NYC.

Again, for that statement to hold any validity there has to have been a lot of similar fires so that we can establish what's "normal". There hasn't been a lot of similar fires. So we have no idea what's "normal" in this kind of situation and should not consider the WTC an anomaly - we have no baseline to compare to.

What we do know is when a plane crashes into the ground (a glancing blow, as opposed to nose-down), the fire usually melts the aluminum fuselage. So all the stuff about liquid metal and reacted aluminum would be completely consistent with a plane crash.

How do you explain thermite remnants found at the site?

Thermite is a metal powder, mostly aluminum. I wonder if there were any other large hunks of aluminum reacting in that situation. Perhaps something that started out vaguely airplane-sized and shaped.

What of the melted concrete?

Fire hot.

And Building 7? How do you explain its collapse?

I frankly don't care. Most of the people who bring up building 7 are as utterly wrong about the towers as you are (ex. 3600 degree steel). As such I really don't care to sort through the mountain of bullshit to find out what actually happened there. Since they're utterly wrong about WTC 1 and 2, I have no reason to believe their accusations about WTC 7.

Btw, this is a good reason why one shouldn't help create such a mountain of erroneous bullshit - one turns away large number of people once they figure out they're wrong. There could've been something nefarious, but no one will ever know because of the massive errors pushed about the towers.

Why was all the physical evidence removed from the site, before it was examined?

Examined for what? Plane hit building->Fire rages->Floor on fire collapses->Building falls down. Don't need a Nobel prize to figure out what happened.

Why was there no physical evidence

You mean that pile of rubble you were just complaining about? The one where you talked about thermite residue and U-shaped steel?

only computer simulations in the Pop Mech and NIST analysis?

Did you expect us to rebuild the towers so we could instrument them and then crash another plane into them? No? Then computer simulations are what you're gonna get.