General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: NYT BOMBSHELL: Significantly MORE 9/11 NEGLIGENCE Than Has Been Disclosed [View all]RoccoR5955
(12,471 posts)is necessary to do forensics. There was very little evidence. Not enough to do proper forensics
Fire may be hot, but rubble isn't that much of an insulator to keep temps at 1K degrees F for a freakin' month
Concrete doesn't turn molten from a building fire.
You ask a NYC fire chief when a building has collapsed before or since the WTC "collapsed."
No, I don't expect to rebuild the towers, but look at the goal of the 9/11 commission report. It was to give an explanation of the official events of the day, the way that the politicians on the commission wanted to craft it. That was the responsibility of organizations like NIST. Heck, they had their jobs at the whim of Bush/Cheney. Don't you think that they would manipulate the "facts" to suit the end result? Do you really think that they would look at the thing to see if it could be reproduced in real life, even with a scale model, and real world physics? You know that computer simulations can be made to do whatever you want them to do, don't you? You don't think that they adjusted their computer models to come out the way they wanted them to? Nah, never happen.
I still don't believe how many people are gullible enough not to know that about computer simulations, and trust them. I guess that that computer stuff is so magical to them, because they don't understand it. Which makes it easy to pull one over on them.
But hey, how many people actually voted for Bush? I guess that there are people who are that gullible.
Did you know that when Max Cleland resigned from the commission in '03, he stated that the White House was covering things up.
What were they covering up? The whole thing?