Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: 1932 General Election [View all]Blue_true
(31,261 posts)32. Maybe "regularly" was an incorrect term.
There was more interference from republicans for Clinton and Obama nominees. On Bush's case, people either just quit, retired or died, there was no unjust, organized interference like republicans have come to practice.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
44 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Expand it to 15, replace the two oldest liberal Justices also. Eight really young solid
Blue_true
Apr 2020
#8
Like republicans when they see an opening, we should not be adverse to a first.
Blue_true
Apr 2020
#13
Well, sometimes mental masturbation is fun, it doesn't have to happen, but one
Blue_true
Apr 2020
#20
During the Clinton administration, the right prevented Judges from getting promotions by
Blue_true
Apr 2020
#24
Aside from getting a better balance on the Court, more justices are needed anyway.
Lonestarblue
Apr 2020
#29
I suspect Stalin wanted Hoover to win and continue maximizing the contradictions.
DemocratSinceBirth
Apr 2020
#9