Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Bernardo de La Paz

(60,320 posts)
9. Broken strategy to attribute malfesance when it is adequately explained by incompetence. . . . nt
Sun Apr 19, 2020, 06:16 AM
Apr 2020

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I think that this is by design. Lowers the count. nt live love laugh Apr 2020 #1
It's not by design Loki Liesmith Apr 2020 #4
How do you know for certain? live love laugh Apr 2020 #5
Your claim is EXTRAordinary. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. Bernardo de La Paz Apr 2020 #10
Hey I wasn't the one advocating a conspiracy theory. Loki Liesmith Apr 2020 #18
The companies make $$$ either way--especially live love laugh Apr 2020 #25
I do agree that Trump does not want to test, gab13by13 Apr 2020 #11
Broken strategy to attribute malfesance when it is adequately explained by incompetence. . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Apr 2020 #9
Curious,question, do you see malfeasance in trumps handling of masks / respirators? lostnfound Apr 2020 #20
In issues you just pointed to, yes, I think malfeasance explains those better than incompetence Bernardo de La Paz Apr 2020 #23
But incompetence TOTALLY explains bad tests? nt live love laugh Apr 2020 #26
Yes. You have only a supposition. A supposition is not evidence & your claim is extraordinary Bernardo de La Paz Apr 2020 #27
You know... I'm just not sure at this point anymore... ck4829 Apr 2020 #21
Tests produced by "dozens of labs and manufacturers that haven't been extensively vetted sop Apr 2020 #2
This has been an issue all along spinbaby Apr 2020 #3
+1, uponit7771 Apr 2020 #6
Really? wow.. thanks for that information, spinbaby. Cha Apr 2020 #28
I just read a couple of docs from the W.H.O. TexasProgresive Apr 2020 #7
Yes, false positives can be just as significant TheRickles Apr 2020 #8
If these false negatives gab13by13 Apr 2020 #12
It's not known how sensitive and specific these tests are. TheRickles Apr 2020 #19
Texasprogressive.... diverdownjt Apr 2020 #16
+1 Varaddem Apr 2020 #24
They should use lung ct scans. greymattermom Apr 2020 #13
Yes they are accurate, gab13by13 Apr 2020 #15
This is why a competent federal government gab13by13 Apr 2020 #14
The COVID-19 test may give false-negative results more than 30% of the time. Danascot Apr 2020 #17
Does this problem occur in Europe? In places that used the WHO test? LAS14 Apr 2020 #22
My neighbor 3 houses down in court marlakay Apr 2020 #29
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»False Negatives Raise Doc...»Reply #9